Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLetters

Using the OSCE strategy for APPEs?

Michael J. Peeters and Craig D. Cox
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education February 2011, 75 (1) 13b; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe75113b
Michael J. Peeters
aUniversity of Toledo College of Pharmacy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Craig D. Cox
bTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor. We read with great interest Dr. Sturpe's description of objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) at United States Schools/Colleges of Pharmacy.1 Improving test reliability is a central tenet to the “objective” term in OSCEs. Content specificity is a concern with OSCE assessments and increasing the number of stations vastly improves test reliability.2 Dr. Sturpe's instruction on the number of OSCE stations required for suitable test reliability is very instructive, with a suggested 12-16 stations.

Assessment drives learning so the test reliability of assessments should be a key concern for pharmacy educators. While numerous versions of advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) evaluations are used at colleges and schools of pharmacy around the country, test reliability of evaluations should be an important consideration. If APPEs were conceptually thought of as analogous to OSCE stations, then together as an OSCE they can speak to a common ability of learners, ie, the ability to practice pharmacy in a number of environments. This ability continuum can range from limited to expansive, but students can fall anywhere along that spectrum.

Individual APPE rotation objectives must be linked to terminal school or college outcomes, and overall experience assessments mapped to these required objectives. Overall experience assessments should be standardized between preceptors and sites to ensure that students are assessed in a similar manner. An example using SOAP notes as part of an overall experience assessment, notes should be assessed more than once in a single APPE and then repeated among multiple core APPEs (ie, 3 notes/APPE over 4 APPEs would provide 12 evaluations).

Additional “stations” also could be included to complement APPE assessments, similar to the variations that Hodge describes.3 Test reliability should be enhanced with additional rigorous assessments of similar APPE objectives – as long as all evaluations are assessing a similar ability in students. An advantage of including additional assessments is that they provide a reliable, standardized means of critical evaluation for all students. Examples of additional assessments include: a final-year student presentation demonstrating evidence-based medicine skills,4 the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy's Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment, or an individual college or school's outcome-based examination prior to APPEs.

Undoubtedly, colleges and schools of pharmacy are investing significant resources into experiential programs and sites. How rigorous (ie, reliable) are methods of evaluation? We forward an alternate paradigm for thinking of APPE evaluations using the strengths of an OSCE approach (ie, improved assessment reliability through greater station numbers). Additionally, some colleges and schools interested in performance-based assessment (such as with an OSCE) may be struggling with finding resources to implement this evaluation. Using experiential programs may foster use of an OSCE approach to assessment.

  • © 2011 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Sturpe DA
    . Objective structured clinical examinations in doctor of pharmacy programs in the United States. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(8):Article 148.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Eva KW,
    2. Neville AJ,
    3. Norman GR
    . Exploring the etiology of content specificity: factors influencing analogic transfer and problem solving. Acad Med. 1998;73(10):S1-S5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hodges B
    . OSCE! Variations on a theme by Harden. Med Educ. 2003;37(12):1134-1140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Peeters MJ,
    2. Sahloff EG,
    3. Stone GE
    . A standardized rubric for student presentations. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(9):Article 171.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 75, Issue 1
10 Feb 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Using the OSCE strategy for APPEs?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
17 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Using the OSCE strategy for APPEs?
Michael J. Peeters, Craig D. Cox
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Feb 2011, 75 (1) 13b; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe75113b

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Using the OSCE strategy for APPEs?
Michael J. Peeters, Craig D. Cox
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Feb 2011, 75 (1) 13b; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe75113b
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Plea for Psychometric Rigor
  • Response to a Plea for Psychometric Rigor
  • Expanding Dress Code Requirements in the Doctor of Pharmacy Program
Show more LETTERS

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2023 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire