Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLetters

Malaysian Pharmacy Educators’ View of the Role of Non-Pharmacy Trained Educators in Teaching Pharmacy Students

Keivan Ahmadi, Mudassir Anwar and Mohamed Azmi Hassali
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education September 2012, 76 (7) 138; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe767138
Keivan Ahmadi
Monash University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mudassir Anwar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohamed Azmi Hassali
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The common statement “…Pharmacy students should only be taught by pharmacists…” is a norm among many pharmacy educators in countries such as Malaysia. It is not, per se, a confronting statement but could indicate alarming attitudes not favorable to the current pharmacy education framework.

Pharmacy education in the third millennium is transformed to contain and reflect on the innovations of the modernization era in which, globalization in health education, public health, development of the new facets of professionalization and professionalism, interprofessional and interdisciplinary teaching and learning activities are among the most talked about topics.1-6

Interestingly, these innovative ideas are the result of extremely cautious, vigilant, accurate, and continuous observations and contemplations which have undergone thorough examinations and experimentations before being presented as novice ideas and/or theories. For example, the notion of interdisciplinary learning dates back to late 1970s7 and today, there is concrete evidence of its effectiveness and usefulness in delivery of better health care.6,8 Hence, to contest such ideas and/or theories, one needs to be able to provide reliable evidence(s), as agreements or disagreements should be borne with a full sense of responsibility and accountability.

In developing countries, the challenges for pharmacy education (eg, public health education) is well acknowledged and even corrective measurements to rectify such shortcomings are suggested.2 These challenges are multileveled and multifaceted; where, not only the lack of awareness and perceived importance of such topics among pharmacy academics, but also the lack of trained pharmacy educators to teach such topics2 necessitates the recruitment of educators other than pharmacists to work in pharmacy education. This has often resulted in subconsciously ambivalent attitudes towards those nonpharmacist educators who teach in pharmacy programs.

There is a voluminous body of literature on interprofessional and interdisciplinary learning as well as evidences of their efficacy from an educational and practical point of view,6,9-11 however, there is a dearth of evidence about the experiences and the level of satisfaction in regards with the peer relationships between the educators involved in interprofessional and interdisciplinary activities. It, without a doubt, is worthwhile to investigate the experiences of the educators involved in interdisciplinary and interprofessional teaching and learning activities in relation with their peers from other disciplines to be able to discuss interprofessional learning in a more robust scientific approach.

Alsharif lucidly presents 5 key strategies to achieve a global pharmacy education where he enlists “sharing,” “respect” and “student empowerment” as the 3 strategies.1 We cannot agree more with his well-structured notion in the context of interprofessional learning, where the educators whose prime responsibility is to empower their students with knowledge and indoctrinate future health care providers with professionalism and a positive attitude of teamwork, should not overlook the importance of a need for sustainable relationship with their peers from other disciplines in the healthcare field. Mutual respect is the backbone of sustainable relationships with peers who are involved in interprofessional and interdisciplinary teaching and learning activities, and without mutual respect, unwanted and undesirable consequences could result which are derogatory, dangerous, and destructive.

First, we recommend studies to investigate the attitude and perception of pharmacist educators toward non-pharmacist educators who are involved in pharmacy education. Second, we recommend further detailed exploration of the attitudes in order to develop and/or improve the conceptual frameworks related to interprofessional teaching and learning activities. Eventually, we could design interventions to enrich the attitudes of teamwork and mutual respect that would move us from a vicious cycle to a virtuous cycle in the circle of pharmacy education, where our final aim is to provide the best possible and available education to future pharmacists.

  • © 2012 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alsharif NZ
    . Globalization of pharmacy education: what is needed? Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(5):Article 77.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hassali MA
    . Challenges and future directions for public health pharmacy education in developing countries. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(10):Article 195.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ahmadi K,
    2. Ahmad Hassali MA
    . Professionalism in pharmacy: a continual societal and intellectual challenge. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(4):Article 72.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Saini B,
    2. Shah S,
    3. Kearey P,
    4. et al
    . An interprofessional learning module on asthma health promotion. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(2):Article 30.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Vrontos EB,
    2. Kuhn CH,
    3. Brittain KL
    . Impact of interprofessional activities on health professions students’ knowledge of community pharmacists’ role and services. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(8):Article 152.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Joyner PU,
    2. Tresolini CP,
    3. Harward DH,
    4. Davis WA
    . Pharmacy student participation in an interdisciplinary case conference. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67(2):Article 45.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Given B,
    2. Simmons S
    . The interdisciplinary health-care team: fact or fiction? Nurs Forum. 1977;16(2):165-184.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Allen DD,
    2. Penn MA,
    3. Nora LM
    . Interdisciplinary healthcare education: fact or fiction? Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(2):Article 39.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Prosser TR,
    2. Burke JM,
    3. Hobson EH
    . Teaching pharmacy students to write in the medical record. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61(2):136-140.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Remington TL,
    2. Foulk MA,
    3. Williams BC
    . Evaluation of evidence for interprofessional education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(3):Article 66.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Marken PA,
    2. Zimmerman C,
    3. Kennedy C,
    4. Schremmer R,
    5. Smith KV
    . Human simulators and standardized Patients to teach difficult conversations to interprofessional health care teams. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(7):Article 120.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 76, Issue 7
10 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Malaysian Pharmacy Educators’ View of the Role of Non-Pharmacy Trained Educators in Teaching Pharmacy Students
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Malaysian Pharmacy Educators’ View of the Role of Non-Pharmacy Trained Educators in Teaching Pharmacy Students
Keivan Ahmadi, Mudassir Anwar, Mohamed Azmi Hassali
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2012, 76 (7) 138; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe767138

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Malaysian Pharmacy Educators’ View of the Role of Non-Pharmacy Trained Educators in Teaching Pharmacy Students
Keivan Ahmadi, Mudassir Anwar, Mohamed Azmi Hassali
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2012, 76 (7) 138; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe767138
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Plea for Psychometric Rigor
  • Response to a Plea for Psychometric Rigor
  • Expanding Dress Code Requirements in the Doctor of Pharmacy Program
Show more LETTERS

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2022 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire