Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Notice_editorialViewpoints

Intraprofessional Sensitivity: A Must for the Academy and the Profession

Naser Z. Alsharif
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education April 2013, 77 (3) 42; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe77342
Naser Z. Alsharif
Creighton University, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The buzz term in healthcare professions education and practice is interprofessional education. Several articles have been published on this topic.1-5 However, little attention is given to intraprofessional education or what I term intraprofessional sensitivity, to emphasize the importance for academics, graduates, and practitioners to be sensitized to and aware of the diverse role and contributions of professionals within pharmacy and to seek to communicate and collaborate with them to optimize the educational process and patient care. A review of the literature resulted in few articles related to intraprofessional education, training, and sensitivity.6-10 However, publication by the American Dental Association11 (Point 1) and the American Physical Therapy Association12 (Goal 16), specifically address intraprofessional education.

In 1995, we published a paper13 in which we identified valuing current practice skills as one of the challenges for implementing pharmaceutical care in a clear message to acknowledge the skills of baccalaureate-educated pharmacists during the push to an all PharmD degree. Since then and for several years before, pharmacy has evolved more and more into a clinical profession with major changes to the curriculum and pharmacists taking on many new responsibilities and specialty practice. However, pharmacy academia and the profession have not emphasized the need for intraprofessional sensitivity in teaching pharmacy students and among pharmacy academics or practitioners.

From the academic side, the guidelines and standards for the PharmD degree set forth by the Accreditation Council For Pharmacy Education (ACPE)14 are key to this discussion. Standard 9 of the document identifies the goal of the pharmacy curriculum as enabling graduates to practice as a member of or on an interprofessional team. Standard 12 highlights the competencies and outcome expectations for the graduates. Neither of the above standards mentions achieving those within an intraprofessional approach. Standard 13 identifies the curricular core; however, none of the core areas address working with, acknowledging, or communicating with pharmacists in the different practice settings. Standard 14 discusses both early and advanced pharmacy practice experiences, but there is no emphasis on preceptors addressing with the students and highlighting ways in which they could establish interactions or collaboration with other pharmacists. Another important aspect to this discussion is while standard 13 clearly highlights the importance of all the sciences, standard 25 specifically identifies the importance of faculty members respecting their colleagues. Appendix B stresses the importance of students being competent in core basic science areas that are “critical to the foundation and delivery of effective patient care.” Unfortunately, however, some new and established programs have gradually started the process of devaluing the importance of the basic sciences, some administrators and faculty members have undermined the important role the sciences and science faculty play in the curriculum, and some science faculty members have developed an antagonistic relationships with clinical faculty members. All of the above deemphasize intraprofessional education within the academy and its members.

From the practice side, none of the major pharmacy organizations based on a literature review has published a white paper on intraprofessional sensitivity. Going back to the manuscript we published in 1995 – at a time when some PharmD graduates were proclaiming their superiority in providing clinical services as compared to baccalaureate-educated pharmacists - we asked for pharmacists to exhibit the same degree of care and support for each other as the era of pharmaceutical care unfolded. Regrettably, throughout the last 25 years of practice, I have seen turf conflicts among pharmacists within the same hospital, lack of respect among pharmacists, and/or no attempts at continuity of care between pharmacists (eg, hospital to community, hospital to nursing home, etc), and administrators who cater to the needs of other administrators or healthcare professionals at the expense of their own pharmacy employees.

For our profession to prosper as pharmacy practice evolves, ACPE standards, educational outcomes, and the curriculum should specifically address the importance of intraprofessional sensitivity. The roles of basic, social, administrative and clinical faculty members have to be highlighted, respected, and appreciated. Courses (eg, healthcare systems, communication skills, and skills laboratories) should provide an in-depth look at the diverse scope of pharmacy practice, the role of pharmacists, pharmacy technicians or interns under each, and challenge students by different activities including simulations to explore models for how pharmacy practitioners in these areas can support, respect, collaborate, and complement each other to optimize patient care. In addition, innovative practice models among pharmacists (eg, hospital, ambulatory, community, regulatory, etc) and between academia and practice should be encouraged and promoted to develop research opportunities, address public health issues, and ensure continuation of care. Residency programs can play a major role in providing such opportunities. Further, administrators in academia and practice have to advocate for and support intraprofessional sensitivity efforts. The ultimate goal should be to instill the respect and care needed to be sensitized to all our pharmacy colleagues who contribute to our beloved profession.

  • Received December 19, 2012.
  • Accepted December 20, 2012.
  • © 2013 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alsharif NZ
    . Cultural humility and interprofessional education/practice: a winning combination. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(7):Article 120.
  2. 2.↵
    AACN, AACOM, AACP, ADEA, AAMC, ASPH. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice. http://www.asph.org/userfiles/CollaborativePractice.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2013.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Smith KM,
    2. Scott DR,
    3. Barner JC,
    4. DeHart RM,
    5. Scott JD,
    6. Martin SJ
    . Interprofessional education in six US colleges of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(4):Article 61.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Buring SM,
    2. Bhushan A,
    3. Broeseker A,
    4. et al
    . Interprofessional education: definition, student competencies and guidelines for implementation. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(4):Article 59.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Buring SM,
    2. Bhushan A,
    3. Brazeau G,
    4. Conway S,
    5. Hansen L,
    6. Westberg S
    . Keys to successful implementation of interprofessional education: learning location, faculty development, and curricular themes. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(4):Article 60.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Yang K,
    2. Woomer GR,
    3. Matthews JT
    . Collaborative learning among undergraduate students in community health nursing. Nurse Educ Pract. 2012;12(2):72-76.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Moore J,
    2. Prentice D
    . Collaboration among nurse practitioners and registered nurses in outpatient oncology. J Adv Nurs. September 25, 2012. [Epub ahead of print].
  8. 8.↵
    1. Blue C,
    2. Phillips R,
    3. Born D,
    4. Lopez N
    . Beginning the socialization to a new workforce model: dental students' preliminary knowledge of and attitudes about the role of the dental therapist. J Dent Educ. 2011;75(11):1465-1475.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Leonard B,
    2. Shuhaibar EL,
    3. Chen R
    . Nursing student perceptions of intraprofessional team education using high-fidelity simulation. J Nurs Educ. 2010;49(11):628-631.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jung B,
    2. Salvatori P,
    3. Martin A
    . Intraprofessional fieldwork education: occupational therapy and occupational therapist assistant students learning together. Can J Occup Ther. 2008; 75(1):42-50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    ADEA Team Study Group Delivers Recommendations for Dental Schools on Interprofessional Education. http://info.adea.org/BDE/Publications/Volume_45/Issue_9/ADEA_Team_Study_Group_Delivers_Recommendations_for_Dental_Schools_on_Interprofessional_Education/. Accessed April 3, 2013.
  12. 12.↵
    APATA Education Strategic Plan (2006-2020). http://www.apta.org/uploadedFiles/APTAorg/About_Us/Policies/BOD/Plans/APTAEducationStrategicPlan.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2013.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Alsharif NZ,
    2. Roche VF,
    3. Murray WJ
    . Making pharmaceutical care work: five challenges for the profession. US Pharmacist. 1999;24:102-109.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/S2007Guidelines2.0_ChangesIdentifiedInRed.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2013.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 77, Issue 3
12 Apr 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intraprofessional Sensitivity: A Must for the Academy and the Profession
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Intraprofessional Sensitivity: A Must for the Academy and the Profession
Naser Z. Alsharif
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Apr 2013, 77 (3) 42; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe77342

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Intraprofessional Sensitivity: A Must for the Academy and the Profession
Naser Z. Alsharif
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Apr 2013, 77 (3) 42; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe77342
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • In Memoriam: George H. Cocolas, PhD
  • Flexner, Educational Reform, and Pharmacy
  • Why Every Aspect of an Academic Pharmacy Career Should Be Viewed Through the Lens of Scholarship
Show more Viewpoints

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2022 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire