Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLETTERS

Disruption Coming to Pharmacy and Pharmacy Education

David A. Knapp and Dee A. Knapp
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education October 2015, 79 (8) 127; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe798127
David A. Knapp
aSchool of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore (emeritus)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dee A. Knapp
bRetired, Frederick, Maryland
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: Romanelli and Tracy write persuasively about a coming disruption in pharmacy.1 Evidence that pharmacy graduation rates may lead to pharmacist supply overtaking job openings is found in US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data, which report pharmacy employment projections for 2012-2022.2 The bureau projects a positive employment change over this period of 41 400 positions, from a 2012 base of 286 400, an increase of 14.5%. Between 2012 and 2022, job openings, as a result of growth and replacement needs, are projected to be 109 800. Assuming that 14 000 to 15 000 new graduates will enter the workforce annually during the period, an oversupply of 40 000 or more is likely to accumulate by 2022.

The authors suggest dealing with the incipient disruption in the profession by proposing a return to a 2-tier system of “dispensing” and “nondispensing” pharmacists. The former would supervise “super technicians” and robotic systems for drug distribution, while the latter would continue to develop clinical therapeutic roles and also help to meet primary care gaps. However, even if implemented by 2022, the total number of job openings for tier-1 and tier-2 pharmacists probably would be less than the BLS projections because market pressures would drive down demand for tier-1 pharmacists and the rapid projected growth of physician assistants (up 38.4% by 2022) and nurse practitioners (up 33.7%) would create more competition for the tier-2 clinicians.2

If we cannot deal successfully with the coming disruption by altering the demand side (at least in the next decade), we have to examine the supply side. That means greater attention to enrollment in all schools and colleges of pharmacy. It is easier to increase enrollment than to decrease it, especially if the decrease is large enough to impact the size of the described disruption in the pharmacy profession. The answer lies with individual schools.

What we have is a classic case of tragedy of the (academic) commons wherein each school reaps more individual benefit from increasing enrollment than by acting for the good of the pharmacist community and enrolling fewer students.3 Therefore, coercing pharmacy schools on some level to hold down enrollment may be necessary. This could come from mandates from higher administration, disengagement of major donors, cuts in budget for public pharmacy schools, unwillingness of students to pay the price for an uncertain future, influence of large employers, or a combination of market forces.

Ignoring the signs and symptoms of the coming disruption in practice could be equally or more disruptive to pharmacy schools. Solutions for individual schools are more likely to be found within the institutions themselves than through discussions across the academy.

  • © 2015 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Romanelli F,
    2. Tracy TS
    . A coming disruption in pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(1):Article 01.
  2. 2.↵
    Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment Projections. United States Department of Labor. http://data.bls.gov/projections/occupationProj. Accessed March 3, 2015.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hardin G
    . The tragedy of the commons. Science. 1968;162(3859):1243-1248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 79, Issue 8
25 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Disruption Coming to Pharmacy and Pharmacy Education
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Disruption Coming to Pharmacy and Pharmacy Education
David A. Knapp, Dee A. Knapp
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Oct 2015, 79 (8) 127; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe798127

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Disruption Coming to Pharmacy and Pharmacy Education
David A. Knapp, Dee A. Knapp
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Oct 2015, 79 (8) 127; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe798127
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Plea for Psychometric Rigor
  • Response to a Plea for Psychometric Rigor
  • Expanding Dress Code Requirements in the Doctor of Pharmacy Program
Show more LETTERS

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2023 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire