Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLETTERS

The Predator and Prey of Publishing Research

Daniel Longyhore and Brenda Zagar
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education October 2015, 79 (8) 128; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe798128
Daniel Longyhore
aWilkes University Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brenda Zagar
bCampbell University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: “Publish or perish.” It is the mantra for faculty members seeking promotion and/or tenure at colleges and schools of pharmacy. Scholarly publications are an important component of a faculty member’s dossier and one that we work hard to maintain throughout our careers. Faculty members suffer the hardship of manuscript rejection many times throughout our careers, especially early on when we are beginning to understand the process of clinical and academic research. It is especially difficult when a research manuscript has been rejected several times, and the author(s) is/are desperately searching for a journal that will accept it. To meet the need to publish, there has been an uprising of predatory “open-access” journals to which authors may submit manuscripts. Their presence is enticing to faculty authors seeking publication after their first, second, third, (and sometimes) fourth submissions have been rejected by reputable journals.

In 2014, Bowman published a special article discussing predatory and questionable practices in publishing, drawing attention to this problem for the first time in the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.1 Not all open-access journals are predatory; instead, the means by which the journal uses (or fails to use) the peer-review process makes it predatory. Many open-access journals, including this one, follow a rigorous peer-review process to ensure relevance and validity of author submissions. However, predatory journals are lesser known, can be part of a larger network of journals, or have a wide range of publication costs in order to “maintain open access for their content.” Poor predatory journals or organizations also may have incomplete websites, misspellings, or grammatical issues on their sites, obviously falsified authors, and/or reference editors and reviewers who do not exist or do not publicly state they are associated with the journal.2

The label “(predatory) open-access journal” is not a formal designation, and the legitimacy of such journals can be accepted or ignored based on individual opinions. Faculty members, residents, students, and tenure and promotion committees may pay as little or as much attention to these types of journals as they wish. The goal is to know they exist and be cognizant of their impact on academic careers and dissemination of research results.

The risk of these predatory journals is not limited to new or junior faculty members, but also to authors unaware of a journal’s status or if it is classified as predatory. The risk is the same for promoted or senior faculty members. The authors of this letter are a faculty member of 10 years and a new residency graduate. Both have first-hand experience being misled, despite performing what seemed to be a reasonable background check on the integrity of the journal and publisher.3 In hindsight, we missed several clues and took them for granted prior to submission. From submission to acceptance, the journal required 20 days, with only 10 days required for the peer-review process. The acceptance letter recommended the manuscript be published as submitted. The submission was slated to be published less than one month from its acceptance, pending a $200 payment to a country not affiliated with any contact numbers or addresses on the journal or publisher’s site.

To prevent others from making our mistake, we submit this letter. Authors have a higher likelihood of spotting a predatory open-access journal by referring to Jeffrey Beall’s lists of predatory open-access publishers and stand-alone journals.4 Beall maintains a regularly updated list of journals and publishers considered predatory. Although this is a comprehensive list, it is not necessarily complete. Authors always should be suspicious of journals not well-known within the profession. If authors have suspicion about a journal, and it is not included on Beall’s list, they may perform their own evaluation by using Beall’s criteria for determining predatory open access publishers.5

  • © 2015 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. John D
    . Bowman (2014). Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78(10):Article 176.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Simpson M,
    2. Krabappel E,
    3. Fun KJ
    . Fuzzy, homogeneous configurations. Aperito J Nanosci Tech. 2014;1:1. doi: 10.14437/AJN-1-101. http://aperito.org/uploads/pdf/AJN-1-101.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2015.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Zagar B,
    2. Longyhore DS
    . Evaluating the association between vitamin B12 deficiency and peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Int J Med Pharm. 2014;2(2):0–10. http://ijmpnet.com/vol-2-no-2-december-2014-abstract-1-ijmp. Accessed April 1, 2015.
  4. 4.↵
    Scholarly Open Access: critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing, Jeffrey Beal. http://scholarlyoa.com. Accessed October 29, 2015.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Beall J
    . Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers. 2nd Ed. 2012. http://scholarlyoa.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/criteria-2012-2.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2015.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 79, Issue 8
25 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Predator and Prey of Publishing Research
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Predator and Prey of Publishing Research
Daniel Longyhore, Brenda Zagar
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Oct 2015, 79 (8) 128; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe798128

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Predator and Prey of Publishing Research
Daniel Longyhore, Brenda Zagar
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Oct 2015, 79 (8) 128; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe798128
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Plea for Psychometric Rigor
  • Response to a Plea for Psychometric Rigor
  • Expanding Dress Code Requirements in the Doctor of Pharmacy Program
Show more LETTERS

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2023 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire