Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleVIEWPOINT

A Reflection of Faculty and Course Evaluations

Nancy Fjortoft
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education November 2015, 79 (9) 129; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe799129
Nancy Fjortoft
Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

“Student Evaluations: Feared, Loathed and Not About to Go Away” was the headline of a recent article in the Chronicle of Higher Education. The article opens by describing a variety of techniques that faculty members use to increase student ratings of their teaching, such as bringing homemade cookies to class, offering low-stakes assessments prior to the evaluation, and not providing adequate time to complete surveys, all to ensure they achieve the desired scores on their faculty evaluations.1 Pharmacy education is not immune to the “fear and loathing” of student evaluations. The utility of faculty and course evaluations completed by students has long been a contentious issue at many universities. However, these data are often considered in annual performance evaluations and promotion and tenure decisions, so its impact is not trivial.

There are 3 central issues commonly discussed regarding students' evaluations of faculty members and courses. First, faculty members routinely cite the low response rate and question the credibility of the data. Survey burden may be a real issue for students and something worth considering. Our society is rife with surveys. For example, a weekend get-away trip may elicit several surveys: from the hotel, TripAdvisor, the airline, and restaurants where you dined. In the academic world, faculty members often use their students as research subjects, and surveys are a useful and frequently used method of collecting data. Faculty members may also use surveys as a teaching tool. Then the end of the term comes, and students are asked to complete faculty and course evaluations, which are most frequently surveys.

At my institution, which uses a quarter system for its academic calendar, a typical student may be asked to complete 19-20 course evaluations and 57-60 faculty evaluations annually. Olson presents the thesis that the overuse of surveys diminishes their effectiveness as a data collection tool.2 Simply put, our students are tired of filling out surveys. Olson goes on to illustrate that low response rates as a result of nonresponse error may be more damaging to the credibility of results than even a small sample.2 Our common method of surveying all students in all classes and in a short window of time may present a situation of survey fatigue, and students simply stop completing surveys. A better approach may be to utilize good sampling estimations and survey a sample of students for each academic term.

Typically, faculty and course evaluations employ a Likert scale. Students are asked to select a range of responses to a statement, and often these data are reported as means. There is a long-standing debate on whether or not calculating averages on ordinal data is statistically viable. Classic biostatistics textbooks simply state that “common arithmetic cannot be performed on ordinal data in a meaningful way.”3 Others may argue that parametric statistics can be used on ordinal data, with robust results.4 While there may not be a conclusive answer to this debate, perhaps presenting the data in multiple ways (median, mode, and mean, interquartile range, and standard deviation) may provide a more comprehensive picture of what the data are telling us.

Finally, the question of who the best person is to conduct evaluations of effective teaching arises. No one will argue that feedback is critical to improvement, but are students the best source? Others may argue that students are in the best position to evaluate effective teaching. Benton and Cashin provide ample evidence of the reliability and validity of student evaluations of teaching.5 On the other hand, Stark and Freisstat state: “We will never be able to measure teaching effectiveness reliably and routinely.” They provide a menu of ideas, ranging from peer observation and review of teaching materials for currency and relevancy to review of student outcomes and assessments.6 In other words, a more complete picture of effective teaching may be gained by triangulating data from multiple perspectives through multiple means.

Effective teaching is essential to effective learning and to our mission of educating tomorrow's pharmacists. Effective teaching also is multifaceted and cannot be measured by reducing it to a single number at the end of an academic term. Time, place, subject matter, and multiple student variables all affect the learning environment, and the teacher is just one part of that environment. Constructive and systematic feedback regarding our teaching and our courses provides us with a framework for our own continuous professional development. We need to ensure that this feedback is reliable, valid, and from multiple perspectives, including those with expertise in effective teaching.

Pharmacy education has demonstrated a steady expansion of teaching evaluation, using various approaches and perspectives.7 We need to continue to share best practices, use multiple perspectives, choose appropriate statistical analysis, learn from esteemed colleagues, and consider alternative ways to collect data from students, such as using samples. A multi-dimensional approach to evaluating effective teaching may truly provide us with a more complete picture of our instruction.

  • © 2015 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Patton S.
    Student evaluations: feared, loathed and not about to go away. Chron. Of Higher Ed. 29, 2015May , .
  2. 2.↵
    1. Olson CA.
    Survey burden, response rates, and the tragedy of the commons. J Cont. Ed in the Health Prof. 2014;34(2):93-95.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rosner B
    . Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing; 1995:552.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Norman G
    . Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv. In Health Sci Educ. 2010;15:625-632.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Benton S, Cashin WE. Student ratings of teaching: a summary of research and literature. The Idea Center, Kansas State University. Ideaedu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/idea-paper_50. Accessed 9/24/2015.
  6. 6.↵
    Stark PF, Freishtat R. An evaluation of course evaluations. ScienceOpen Research 2014. 09/2014.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Barnett CW,
    2. Matthews HW
    . Teaching evaluation practices in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Ed. 2009;73(6):Article 103.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 79, Issue 9
25 Nov 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Reflection of Faculty and Course Evaluations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Reflection of Faculty and Course Evaluations
Nancy Fjortoft
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Nov 2015, 79 (9) 129; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe799129

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Reflection of Faculty and Course Evaluations
Nancy Fjortoft
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Nov 2015, 79 (9) 129; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe799129
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Doing Your Part to Advance Pharmacy Education Scholarship
  • New Opportunities for AJPE Authors
  • The Influence of Interim Deans: More Than Keeping the Ship Afloat and Warming the Captain’s Seat
Show more VIEWPOINT

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2022 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire