Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Article CommentaryCOMMENTARY

The Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process and More

Eric G. Boyce
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education May 2017, 81 (4) 62; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe81462
Eric G. Boyce
Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, California
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The development and approval of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (“the Process”) by the Joint Commission of Pharmacy Practitioners and incorporation of the Process into the 2016 Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Standards has the potential to lead to important changes in the practice of pharmacy, and to the enhanced acknowledgment, acceptance, and reimbursement for pharmacy and pharmacist services.1,2 Colleges and schools of pharmacy can play a critical role in developing student abilities related to the Process within their pharmacy curriculum, leading to the full development and implementation of this Process by students, trainees and practitioners. The Process does not stand alone and should be considered as one foundation of patient care that is supported, supplemented, and complemented by other abilities.

A standardized, progressive, systematic approach across the curriculum is the best approach to effectively develop student abilities. The Process includes the development of abilities to Collect, Assess, Plan, Implement, and Follow-Up (Monitor and Evaluate), but also to then repeat the Process for each patient.1 Each of those abilities is related to other knowledge, skills, and behaviors. Many, if not all, of these components require students to have sophisticated knowledge of drugs, diseases and disorders, and laboratory and other clinical studies in addition to informatics, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Professionalism, communication, education, interaction, cultural competence, and interprofessional abilities also are needed for successful implementation of the Process. Additionally, motivation, initiation, valuing, awareness, compliance, and other behaviors and attitudes of the affective domain are also key to effective implementation of the Process.

Development of the Process in students should include the development of a pharmacist-specific work-up as outlined in the foundations of prior patient care processes developed for pharmacists.3-7 Students should develop a standardized approach to assessing, prioritizing, and resolving drug-related problems such as untreated conditions, appropriate drug selection, duplication of therapy, use of drugs without a condition or indication, over- or under-dosing, adverse effects or toxicity, allergic reactions, drug interactions, adherence, availability and access, cost, and outcomes expectations. Students also should be looking for the beneficial outcomes of drug therapy and pharmacy services with respect to patient understanding, disease and disorder prevention, and medication-associated efficacy and safety.

Finally, it is important to recognize that the Process includes the need for documentation. Recognizing that one answer will not meet everyone’s needs, I strongly recommend that pharmacy students be taught and develop abilities to use at least a basic subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) note format. It may be even more beneficial to consider the development of abilities to create full work-up SOAP notes in addition to specialty, targeted, or follow-up SOAP notes. The intent of the Process is not to replace the SOAP note, but rather to provide a process to enable students to have a systematic, pharmacist-specific process to affect patient care, including the ability to document their information, assessments, recommendations, referrals, and other actions.

In summary, we need to think beyond the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process as a new, single entity that will impact our curricula. Instead, we should be considering how to develop the Process as one of many inter-related foundations for the delivery of effective, evidence-based and outcomes-focused patient care by a pharmacist for today and the future.

  • Received October 27, 2016.
  • Accepted November 16, 2016.
  • © 2017 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Joint Commission of Pharmacy Practitioners. Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process. 2014. https://jcpp.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Patient_Care_Process_Template_Presentation-Final.pdf. Accessed October 27, 2016.
  2. 2.↵
    Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Standards 2016. 2015. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf. Accessed October 27, 2016.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hepler CD,
    2. Strand LM
    . Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990;47(3):533-543.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. 4.↵
    American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. ASHP statement on pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1993; 50:1720-1723. http://www.ashp.org/doclibrary/bestpractices/orgstpharmcare.aspx. Accessed October 27, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Medication therapy management in pharmacy practice. Core elements of an MTM service model. Version 2.0. American Pharmacists Association and National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation. March 2008. http://www.pharmacist.com/sites/default/files/files/core_elements_of_an_mtm_practice.pdf. Accessed October 27, 2016.
  6. 6.↵
    Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative. The Patient-Centered Medical Home: Integrating Comprehensive Medication Management to Optimize Patient Outcomes – Resource Guide. 2nd ed. 2012. https://www.pcpcc.org/sites/default/files/media/medmanagement.pdf. Accessed October 27, 2016.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Harris IM,
    2. Phillips B,
    3. Boyce E,
    4. et al
    . Clinical pharmacy should adopt a consistent process of direct patient care. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34(8):e133-e148.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 81, Issue 4
1 May 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process and More
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process and More
Eric G. Boyce
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education May 2017, 81 (4) 62; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe81462

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process and More
Eric G. Boyce
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education May 2017, 81 (4) 62; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe81462
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Five Most Important Lessons I Learned Along the Path to Clinical Professor
  • Looking Abroad for Inspiration to Enhance the Scholarly Work We Do at Home
  • A Call to Action to Remove ACPE Limits on Non-Patient Care Elective Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences
Show more COMMENTARY

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2023 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire