Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLETTER

Response to Standardized Colleagues in Pharmacy Education

Chris Gillette and Nicole Rockich-Winston
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education August 2018, 82 (6) 7275; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7275
Chris Gillette
aWingate University School of Pharmacy, Wingate, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole Rockich-Winston
bMedical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: We would like to thank Drs. Berenbrok and Sparks for their letter and kind words about our study. We agree with the letter, that standardized colleagues are a method toward teaching pharmacy graduates to be both “practice- and team-ready.” Previous research in this area has shown that student pharmacists are better able to recognize the role of other health care professionals than before the encounters and were more comfortable disclosing an error to a patient’s prescriber with standardized patient encounters on cases with students in different health care professions.1-3 In fact, all health professionals could potentially benefit from standardized colleague exercises.

An interesting aspect of the letter by Drs. Berenbrok and Sparks is the idea of standardized colleague exercises, which have been shown to be effective in helping develop team-based competencies.4,5 We believe that research into developing “team-ready” health care professionals is in its infancy because of the more recent importance on developing those skills in health professional students. For example, the most recent educational standards in medical education, physician assistant education, pharmacy education, physical therapy education, and nursing education require that graduates perform as members of an interdisciplinary team.6-9 Moreover, a recent article in the Journal of Public Health identified that the implicit hierarchy (with physicians at the top) as well as the perceived roles of pharmacists were barriers to developing interprofessional collaboration.10 Future research in other health professions education also should examine the utility of standardized colleagues.

We also support initiatives that create situations for health profession students to practice their role with students from other disciplines. For example, the Medical College of Georgia has recently initiated simulated learning experiences, including addressing a medical error, with “senior” students (fourth-year medical students, fourth-year pharmacy students, etc.) to provide opportunities to learn how each discipline’s role complements one another and creates a cohesive team unit. Simple aspects of teamwork, such as which discipline to reach out to when patients require community resources (social workers), may be overlooked by seasoned health care educators, but are crucial teamwork skills for the next generation of health care professionals.

As such, it seems that the impetus to improve the teamwork aspect of health care has been appreciated by the respective accrediting bodies because of the addition of these salient standards within accreditation guidelines. Further, we support any intervention that can reduce those barriers during the educational process so that future graduates of all health professions are more comfortable practicing in patient-centered, interprofessional teams.

  • © 2018 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Westburg SM,
    2. Adams J,
    3. Thiede K,
    4. Stratton TP,
    5. Bumgardner MA
    . An interprofessional activity using standardized patients. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(2):Article 34.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Wamsley M,
    2. Staves J,
    3. Kroon L,
    4. et al
    . The impact of an interprofessional standardized patient exercise on attitudes toward working in interprofessional teams. J Interprof Care. 2012;26(1):28-35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Vyas D,
    2. McCulloh R,
    3. Dyer C,
    4. Gregory G,
    5. Higbee D
    . An interprofessional course using human patient simulation to teach patient safety and teamwork skills. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(4):Article 71.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Davies ML,
    2. Schonder KS,
    3. Meyer SM,
    4. et al
    . Changes in student performance and confidence with a standardized patient and standardized colleague interprofessional activity. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(5):Article 69.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Shrader S,
    2. Dunn B,
    3. Blake E,
    4. et al
    . Incorporating standardized colleague simulations in a clinical assessment course and evaluating the impact on interprofessional communication. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(4):Article 57.
  6. 6.↵
    Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the MD Degree. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges and American Medical Association; 2018.
  7. 7.↵
    Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant, Inc. Accreditation Standards for Physician Assistant Education. 4th ed. http://www.arc-pa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Standards-4th-Ed-March-2018.pdf. Updated March 2018. Accessed July 13, 2018.
  8. 8.↵
    Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education. Standards and required elements for accreditation of physical therapist education programs. http://www.capteonline.org/uploadedFiles/CAPTEorg/About_CAPTE/Resources/Accreditation_Handbook/CAPTE_PTStandardsEvidence.pdf. Updated December 7, 2017. Accessed July 13, 2018.
  9. 9.↵
    Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing. Accreditation manual: Section III, 2017 standards and criteria. http://www.acenursing.net/manuals/SC2017.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2018.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Supper I,
    2. Catala O,
    3. Lustman M,
    4. et al
    . Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. J Pub Health. 2015;37(4):716-727.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 82, Issue 6
1 Aug 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to Standardized Colleagues in Pharmacy Education
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Response to Standardized Colleagues in Pharmacy Education
Chris Gillette, Nicole Rockich-Winston
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Aug 2018, 82 (6) 7275; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7275

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Response to Standardized Colleagues in Pharmacy Education
Chris Gillette, Nicole Rockich-Winston
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Aug 2018, 82 (6) 7275; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7275
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Our Priorities Are Not Evolving, but Our Strategies Are
  • Response to Smith et al Letter RE: Evolving Priorities Commentary
  • Response to: But Scholarship Can Be Hard in Many Ways
Show more LETTER

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2022 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire