Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Article CommentaryCOMMENTARY

Commit Yourself to Improvement of Student Learning

Margarita V. DiVall and Lauren Schlesselman
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education September 2018, 82 (7) 7000; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7000
Margarita V. DiVall
aNortheastern University School of Pharmacy, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Schlesselman
bCenter for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
cAssociate Editor, , Arlington, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Keywords
  • assessment
  • faculty development
  • student learning

The word “assessment” may be the most dreaded word in higher education. Many faculty members associate assessment with institutional compliance and accreditation, which come with self-studies, site visits, and evaluative judgments. While assessment can take on many forms, it should always be about quality assurance and focused on improving programs and student learning. Having conversations that avoid assessment jargon (often only understood by assessment experts) can reduce the deep chasm that often exists between assessment administrators and faculty members.

Instead faculty members are encouraged to think about assessment more as educational effectiveness with the goal of improvement.1 Ask yourself “what am I doing to find out whether students learned this material? How do I know that I have actually made an impact on student learning? What was that impact?” More often than not, you are doing a lot and the next question might be: “Once I have the information about student learning, how am I using it to further improve teaching and learning in my classroom or at the experiential site?” This is what we assessment people call – closing the assessment loop and is, unfortunately, often the step that is skipped the most.2

Just giving an examination does not ensure the students learned or that you are actually measuring achievement of the learning objectives. Further, many of the skills and attitudes so important for pharmacy students are difficult to measure via a test, including critical thinking and skills and attitudes in the affective domain. When analyzing performance, it is important to not only focus on grade distribution, but also on psychometrics that indicate whether the assessment can be considered reliable and valid through an examination of individual item performance and alignment of individual items to the learning objectives. Local assessment expertise can be leveraged when faculty members are uncertain on how to interpret item analyses reports or develop question items aligned to learning objectives.

Faculty members are encouraged to employ a variety of formative and summative assessment strategies to ensure they go beyond measuring lower level Bloom’s knowledge using multiple choice tests.3 Although the idea of more classroom assessments may make some faculty members cringe because of the time needed to grade, it is important to remember that not all tools need to be graded. Formative tools provide opportunities to understand what your students comprehend, modify your teaching, and even provide feedback without grading.

Regardless of the tools used, planning and mapping to learning outcomes is critical.4 Many faculty members will say they cannot write their examination questions until they have actually taught the class. When learning objectives are well designed in advance of the course, faculty members can and should develop evidence of learning tools prior to teaching. Because your learning objectives state what a student will know or be able to do, your evidence of learning should be designed for students to demonstrate those skills and knowledge, rather than the individual recall of facts.

Once the evaluation of the examination has been completed and scoring finalized, it is important to examine performance at the level of individual learning outcomes. Many schools use technology that allows faculty members to examine these data not only for each individual assessment but across their courses. Conversations about what constitutes acceptable performance at various stages of student education should take place among faculty colleagues. These benchmarks can be used to determine whether students are meeting these targets and what needs to be changed in the instruction to improve learning, especially in cases when students are underperforming. Finally, faculty members are encouraged to use the evidence of learning in their courses to document their teaching effectiveness as part of their teaching portfolios and promotion dossiers, as well as to generate scholarship of teaching and learning.

If these activities are done properly at the faculty and student level, the learning objectives, evidence of learning, reflection, and revision collectively contribute to assessment of learning and overall programmatic assessment plans. Focusing on quality and recognition of the faculty efforts to improve student learning can greatly contribute to establishing the sometimes elusive culture of assessment.

  • Received February 5, 2018.
  • Accepted February 17, 2018.
  • © 2018 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Roscoe DD
    . Toward an improvement paradigm for academic quality. Lib Educ. 2017;103(1).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Banta TW,
    2. Blaich C
    . Closing the assessment loop. Change. 2011;43(1):22-27.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Angelo TA,
    2. Cross KP
    . Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1993.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wittstrom K,
    2. Cone C,
    3. Salazar K,
    4. Bond R,
    5. Dominguez K
    . Alignment of pharmacotherapy course assessments with course objectives. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(5):Article 76.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 82, Issue 7
1 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Commit Yourself to Improvement of Student Learning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Commit Yourself to Improvement of Student Learning
Margarita V. DiVall, Lauren Schlesselman
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2018, 82 (7) 7000; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Commit Yourself to Improvement of Student Learning
Margarita V. DiVall, Lauren Schlesselman
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2018, 82 (7) 7000; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Are Prerequisite Courses Barriers to Pharmacy Admission or the Keys to Student Success?
  • Does the Academy Have Trust Issues?
  • Using Online Cancer Genomics Databases to Provide Teaching Resources for Pharmacy Education
Show more COMMENTARY

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • assessment
  • faculty development
  • student learning

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2023 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire