Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLETTER

Response to “Underestimation in Self-Assessment”

Samuel Karpen
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education June 2019, 83 (5) 7644; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7644
Samuel Karpen
University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: It is always gratifying when someone voluntarily reads my manuscripts carefully enough to raise insightful criticisms. Dr. Panjwani discusses important boundary conditions of self-enhancement, and I generally agree with her; however, this would not be a proper reply without a counterargument.

As Dr. Panjwani notes and extensive literature attests, self-enhancement is attenuated among more collectivist cultures,1,2 but it does not always disappear.3-5 Kurman found that most collectivists—though to a lesser extent than individualists—believed that they were more academically adept than average.4 Furthermore, collectivists and individualists self-enhance equally for communal traits like honesty and cooperation.4,6,7 While collectivists and individualists differ in amount and type of self-enhancement, even collectivists could benefit from interventions designed to promote accurate self-assessment.

Additionally, attenuated self-enhancement does not require attenuated self-enhancement motives. Perhaps individualists and collectivists have similar needs to self-enhance, but modesty norms encourage collectivists to keep it to themselves. Indeed, Kurman reaches this conclusion, and several lines of research support her. Japanese students tend to describe themselves more positively in private than in public,8 and collectivists show significantly more positive self-regard on implicit measures than on explicit measures.9,10 While multiple mechanisms underlie collectivists occasionally attenuated self-enhancement, several lines of research indicate that the attenuation may be partly due to self-censoring.

Without experience in mental health services or clinical/counseling psychology, I am not qualified to discuss imposter syndrome. My only concern is that the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual does not recognize it. To the extent that it overlaps with depression, it should mitigate some types of self-enhancement.11

While Dr. Panjwani and I may not be on the same page, we are in the same chapter. Self-enhancement varies with time, culture, and mental status, and educators should be sensitive to those variations. Her concluding paragraph expresses this idea better than anything I can think to write, so I will direct the reader back to her letter.

  • © 2019 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Marcus HR,
    2. Kitayama S
    . Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98(2):224-253.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Heine SJ,
    2. Lehman DR,
    3. Marcus HR,
    4. Kitayama S
    . Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychol Rev. 1999;106(4):766-794.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lee YT,
    2. Seligman MEP
    . Are Americans more optimistic than the Chinese? Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1997;23(1):32-40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kurman J
    . Self-enhancement: is it restricted to individualistic cultures? Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2001;27(12):1705-1716.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kurman J
    . Why is self-enhancement low in certain collectivist cultures? An investigation of two competing explanations. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2003;34(5):496-510.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sedikides C,
    2. Gaertner L,
    3. Toguchi Y
    . Pancultural self-enhancement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(1):60-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Brown JD,
    2. Kobayashi C
    . Self-enhancement in Japan and America. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2002;5(3):145-167.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Harihara M, Yamaguchi S, Niiya Y. Japanese self-effacement: low self-regard of self-presentation? Poster at 15th Annual Congress of the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology. July 2000. Pultusk, Poland.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yamaguchi S,
    2. Greenwald AG,
    3. Banaji MR,
    4. et al
    . Apparent universality of positive implicit self-esteem. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(6):498-500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kitayama S,
    2. Uchida Y
    . Explicit self-criticism and implicit self-regard: evaluating self and friend in two cultures. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2003;39(5):476-482.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dobson K,
    2. Franche RL
    . A conceptual and empirical review of the depressive realism hypothesis. Can J Behav Sci. 1989;21(4):419-433.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 83, Issue 5
1 Jun 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to “Underestimation in Self-Assessment”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Response to “Underestimation in Self-Assessment”
Samuel Karpen
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Jun 2019, 83 (5) 7644; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7644

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Response to “Underestimation in Self-Assessment”
Samuel Karpen
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Jun 2019, 83 (5) 7644; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7644
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Our Priorities Are Not Evolving, but Our Strategies Are
  • Response to Smith et al Letter RE: Evolving Priorities Commentary
  • Response to: But Scholarship Can Be Hard in Many Ways
Show more LETTER

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2022 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire