Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleRESEARCH

Longitudinal Associations Between Grit, Academic Outcomes, and Residency Match Rates Among Pharmacy Students

Katherine Gruenberg, Tina Brock and Conan MacDougall
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education August 2019, 83 (6) 6947; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6947
Katherine Gruenberg
aDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tina Brock
aDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, California
bFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conan MacDougall
aDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To characterize Grit-S scores in pharmacy students, determine whether Grit-S scores change within individual pharmacy students and cohorts over time, and investigate the relationship between Grit-S scores, academic outcomes, and professional outcomes.

Methods. A survey was conducted in fall 2016 and again in fall 2017 to determine Grit-S scores in first- through fourth-year pharmacy students. Participant demographic variables, grade point average (GPA), advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) ratings, and residency match results were collected.

Results. Over the study period, 852 survey responses were completed by 85% of students surveyed. The mean Grit-S scores of each cohort ranged from 3.5 to 3.7 (on a 5-point scale with 5 representing the highest level of grit). Underrepresented minorities had slightly higher Grit-S scores and first-generation college students had slightly lower Grit-S scores. Two hundred eighty-seven students responded to both the 2016 and 2017 surveys. Among these paired responses, small but significant changes in individual Grit-S scores over time that varied in direction and magnitude by school year were noted. Higher Grit-S scores were not associated with higher GPA or superior APPE performance, nor were they predictive of a student matching to a postgraduate pharmacy residency.

Conclusion. Significant associations between grit and measures of academic or professional achievement were not detected in this pharmacy student cohort. The presence of small but significant changes in Grit-S scores over time, in the absence of any intervention, has implications that further research should be conducted in this area.

Keywords
  • grit
  • achievement
  • academic success
  • pharmacy education

INTRODUCTION

Grit is a psychological construct that includes consistency of interest and perseverance of effort, and has gained attention for its positive association with achievement, including retention in the United States Military Academy and success in the Scripps National Spelling Bee.1 Grit has also been associated with academic success in secondary, undergraduate, and graduate education.2-4 These results have stimulated interest in identifying and cultivating grit in learners.5

Passion and resilience are qualities many would associate with health professionals. Despite difficult and stressful situations, health professionals must consistently be able to prioritize the needs of their patients. Studies in the United Kingdom and Australia suggest that grit levels are relatively high overall among hospital-based and community-based health practitioners and inversely associated with disengagement, burnout, and exhaustion.6,7 Because grit is associated with both educational and professional resilience, programs have begun to explore the role of grit in admissions to and skills development in health professions training.8-11 Within medical education, studies have shown that higher grit scores are linked to greater academic achievement in students and lower rates of burnout, depression, and attrition in residents.4,12,13 Within pharmacy education, studies to date have produced conflicting results about the relationship between grit and academic achievement.14,15

Grit has primarily been investigated via cross-sectional or prospective study designs. Duckworth and colleagues previously determined that scores on the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S) were stable over a one-year period among adolescent students.2 The potential for change in an individual’s grit levels over time and the relationship between changing grit levels and academic or professional outcomes at the individual and cohort level have not been explored in health professions students.

We surveyed pharmacy students at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), School of Pharmacy (SOP) using the Grit-S scale twice, with testing separated by approximately one year. Our goals were to: characterize grit in UCSF pharmacy students; determine how grit changes in pharmacy students and their cohorts over time; and investigate the relationship between grit, academic outcomes (ie, grade point average [GPA] and performance on advanced pharmacy practice experiences [APPEs]), and professional outcomes (pursuit and attainment of postgraduate residency training [PGY1]) among respondents.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of pharmacy students enrolled at the UCSF SOP from September 2016 to September 2017. The UCSF Institutional Review Board certified this study through an exemption.

During orientation week for fall semester 2016 and fall semester 2017, we sent individualized, internet-based survey invitations (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) to all pharmacy students enrolled in the UCSF SOP. For students in years one through three of the program (P1, P2, P3), we provided study information and allocated time to complete the survey during live classroom orientation sessions. For any student who did not have an electronic device available during this period, we provided a printed version of the survey. We emailed the study objectives and investigator contact information along with a link to the electronic survey instrument to students in year four of the program (P4). We incentivized students to complete the survey by entering participants in a drawing to receive one of two $25 gift cards per cohort.

The survey instrument included the eight-item Grit-S scale, which had previously been studied in pharmacy students.14,15 The Grit-S scale produces a score ranging from 1=low grit to 5=high grit and is composed of two subscales that measure perseverance of effort and consistency of interest. Scoring and validation of the Grit-S scale has been described previously.2

We linked each survey response to a UCSF pharmacy student ID number to allow us to study associations between Grit-S score, demographic characteristics, academic outcomes, and professional outcomes. At the UCSF SOP, only didactic performance contributes to GPA. Thus, we defined deficient performance in an APPE as receipt of a “does not meet expectations” rating in any area for one or more APPEs. We defined APPE failure as receipt of a non-passing final evaluation on any APPE. We obtained American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) residency application and residency match information from the UCSF SOP. These variables and outcomes were chosen based on previous association with Grit-S score and/or academic success.2,14-18 We stored the aggregate, de-identified data in an encrypted, password-protected computer owned by one of the study investigators.

Participant demographics and outcomes were characterized using descriptive statistics, presented as mean plus or minus the standard deviation. Cronbach alpha characterized the reliability of Grit-S and its corresponding subscales. Demographic characteristics and GPAs of survey responders and nonresponders were compared using chi-square tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Paired t tests were used to compare the change in Grit-S scores for students with two grit measurements (fall 2016 and fall 2017) during the study period. Unpaired t tests compared the Grit-S scores of cohorts at the same level (ie, P1 grit scores for the classes of 2020 and 2021). The relationships between participant characteristics and initial Grit-S score were characterized using linear regression, both individually and as a multivariable model. Students’ GPAs was categorized into three categories (<3.0, 3.0-3.49, and ≥3.5) and ordinal logistic regression was used to test the relationship between Grit-S scores and GPA, adjusting for potential confounders. Grade point average was analyzed either as a student’s performance from the initial grit measurement forward or as cumulative GPA (using all available data, including GPA for courses completed before the initial grit measurement). A logistic regression model was created to examine the relationship between Grit-S score and the likelihood of receiving a “does not meet expectations” rating on any APPE, as well as of pursuit and attainment of an ASHP-accredited residency. A p value of less than .05, unadjusted for multiple comparisons, was designated as significant a priori. All data analysis was conducted using STATA (College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Overall, 422 students (84%) completed the survey in fall 2016 and 430 students (86%) completed the survey in fall 2017. The lowest response rates during both survey administration periods (62% in fall 2016 and 70% in fall 2017) were among P4 students. Table 1 summarizes participant demographics by anticipated year of graduation and level in the program (P1, P2, P3, or P4). The mean age of all participants was 25 (SD=3) years. The majority of students identified as female (70%) and were of East Asian/Filipino/Pacific Islander descent (54%). Approximately 17% of respondents were underrepresented minorities, and almost 50% of respondents in each graduation cohort were first-generation college students. The mean undergraduate science GPA of participants ranged from 3.3 to 3.5 on a 4.0 scale. Students’ mean cumulative pharmacy GPA at the time of the survey ranged from 3.4 to 3.6 on a 4.0 scale. The only significant differences between survey respondents and nonrespondents were cumulative pharmacy GPA for P2 students and cumulative pharmacy GPA for P4 students at the time of the survey in fall 2016 and cumulative pharmacy GPA for P2 students at the time of the survey in fall 2017.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics, Grade Point Average, and Residency Match Status of Pharmacy Student Participants by Graduation Year (N=852)

The mean Grit-S scores of each group ranged from 3.5 to 3.7 (Table 2). The P1 students who completed the survey in fall 2016 had the highest mean Grit-S scores 3.7 (SD=0.5). Across all cohorts, mean score on the perseverance of effort subscale of the Grit-S was greater than the mean score on the consistency of interest subscale. Cronbach alpha ranged from 0.63 to 0.73 depending on the scale or subscale and survey year, and in all cases revealed acceptable reliability.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Mean Total Grit-S Scores and Subscale Grit-S Scores of Pharmacy Student Participants by Year Tested and Graduation Year (N=852)

Figure 1 depicts the mean Grit-S scores and changes in Grit-S scores over time by graduation cohort. The class of 2020 showed a significant decrease in paired Grit-S score from the P1 to P2 year, while the class of 2019 (P2 to P3 year) and the class of 2018 (P3 to P4 year) showed significant increases in reported Grit-S score over time (Figure 1). Analysis of Grit-S subscales revealed that significant changes in paired Grit-S responses by graduation cohort were powered by different subscales (Table 3). Grit-S scores were also compared across graduation cohorts by academic year (eg, P1 scores for the class of 2020 and P1 scores for the class of 2021) to determine whether there were curricular influences upon Grit-S scores. Across all comparisons, significant differences were detected between P1 Grit-S scores for the classes of 2020 and 2021 (difference 0.17 [95% CI: 0.03 - 0.30]; p= .01) and P3 scores for the classes of 2018 and 2019 (-0.17 [95% CI: -0.31- -0.02]; p=.02; Table 4).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Mean Grit-S Scores and Paired Differences in Grits-S Score by Graduation Cohert

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Paired Changes in Total and Subscale Grit-S Scores Among Individual Pharmacy Student Participants Between 2016 and 2017 (N=287)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4.

Comparisons of Total Grit-S Scores Between Different Pharmacy Student Cohorts at the Same Level in Pharmacy School Between 2016 and 2017

The relationships between participant characteristics and initial Grit-S score were characterized to inform regression modeling. Unadjusted analysis of the relationship between student characteristics and initial Grit-S score found that underrepresented minority participants reported significantly higher Grit-S scores than non-underrepresented minority students (0.12 [95% CI: 0.01 - 0.24]). African-American students had higher initial Grit-S scores compared to both East Asian students (0.29 [95% CI: 0.06 - 0.53]) and white students (0.28 [95% CI: 0.03- 0.54]). All other comparisons between ethnicities found no significant differences. First-generation college students had significantly lower initial Grit-S scores than non-first-generation students (-0.11 [95% CI: -0.19 - -0.02]). There was not a significant difference in Grit-S scores based on gender (-0.04 [95% CI: -0.13-0.06]). Students with an undergraduate GPA less than 3.0 had numerically higher Grit-S scores compared to students with an undergraduate GPA ≥3.0, but the difference was not significant (-0.11 [95% CI: -0.28 - 0.06] and -0.18 [95% CI: -0.34 - -0.01], respectively; p=.07). On multivariable linear regression, when all these variables except for underrepresented minority status (because of the overlap with ethnicity) were included, only first-generation college student status was associated with initial Grit-S score (-0.10 [95% CI: -0.20 - -0.01]).

Initial Grit-S score was not significantly predictive of categorized pharmacy GPA (<3.0, 3.0-3.49, or ≥3.5) measured after the initial survey administration using ordinal logistic regression (0.89 [95% CI: 0.61 - 1.28]) (Table 5). When categorized GPA was cumulative, higher Grit-S scores were significantly associated with likelihood of being in a lower GPA category (0.70 [95% CI: 0.49 - 0.99]). In models including initial Grit-S score, GPA prior to initial Grit-S score (either prior pharmacy GPA or undergraduate GPA for P1 students), underrepresented minority status, and first-generation college student status, the two variables that were significantly associated with pharmacy GPA (either measured after initial Grit-S score or cumulative) were underrepresented minority status and GPA prior to obtaining initial Grit-S score. Changes in paired Grit-S scores and GPAs between the P1 to P2 and P2 to P3 years were not significantly correlated (p=.74).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5.

Association Between Grit-S Scores and Academic Outcomes (Pharmacy GPA Following Initial Grit-S Assessment or Cumulative Pharmacy GPA) Using Ordinal Logistic Regression

Among students with APPE performance data, failure was rare (3%). The mean Grit-S scores for students with an APPE failure was 4.6 (vs 3.6 for students without an APPE failure). A deficient rating on any APPE evaluation occurred in 48% (38/79) of respondents with APPE data. There was no relationship between a deficient rating and initial Grit-S score, either alone or after adjusting for pharmacy school GPA, underrepresented minority status, and first-generation college student status (Table 6). More than 75% of P4 respondents applied to ASHP-accredited pharmacy residency programs during the 2016-2017 application period. Of those applicants, 87% of candidates matched with a residency program. Logistic regression modeling indicated that higher initial Grit-S score was associated with significantly lower odds of applying to an ASHP-accredited residency. Grit-S score did not predict attainment of an ASHP-accredited residency position among applicants or all P4 survey respondents (including those who did not apply for an ASHP-accredited residency). This effect persisted after controlling for potential confounders.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 6.

Association Between Grit-S Scores and Experiential and Professional Outcomes (Deficient APPE Evaluation, Application to an ASHP-Accredited Residency, ASHP Residency Match Among Applicants, or ASHP Residency Match Among all P4 Respondents) Using Logistic Regression

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study of grit in health professions students measured over time and correlated to validated covariates, academic outcomes, and professional outcomes. We found small but significant differences in individual Grit-S scores when measured in the same students approximately one year after the initial survey in the absence of any intervention. The direction and magnitude of these changes varied by student level. While these changes did not correlate to student GPA over the year, the implications of these findings are worth discussing. For example, the class of 2020 showed a significant decline on the Grit-S consistency of interest subscale from the beginning of their P1 to their P2 year. This change may have reflected the foundational topics discussed in the P1 curriculum. Interestingly, this effect did not persist among paired responses from the other cohorts. A significant increase in students’ scores on the Grit-S perseverance of effort subscale occurred from the P3 to the P4 year, which may illustrate the perseverance gained while these students were completing APPEs. The class of 2019 also showed a significant increase in the Grit-S perseverance of effort subscale from the P2 to P3 years, possibly because of the rigorous therapeutics course series that begins during the P2 year. Although grit is intended to measure perseverance and passion for long-term goals, our results suggest that a pharmacy curriculum may influence these characteristics over a short period of time.

Additionally, we detected significant differences between Grit-S scores at the cohort level. For example, two cohorts of students participated in this study at the start of their P1 year (the classes of 2020 and 2021). The mean Grit-S score for the class of 2020 cohort was significantly greater than the mean Grit-S score of the class of 2021 cohort. While grit is typically measured on the individual level, peer grit scores may offer predictive value for outcomes of interest, including academic performance.19 The social cognitive theory of learning supports the notion of group dynamics influencing individual outcomes.20 While the measurement of grit on a group level was not the objective of the present study, based on our findings, future studies should investigate the effects of collective grit scores on individual academic and professional outcomes within health professions education.

Student and cohort-level variability in what may be considered a relatively fixed psychological trait has several implications for future studies in this area. First, interventional studies that would aim to influence (presumably, to increase) a student’s Grit-S score should include a control group. Our data clearly show significant changes in Grit-S scores over time periods as short as one year in the absence of any intervention. Therefore, changes in Grit-S scores could be misattributed to an intervention in the absence of a control group. Second, the changes in paired Grit-S scores by student level in pharmacy school suggest that elements within the pharmacy school environment may impact perceived “grittiness.” Future studies following multiple cohorts of students through a pharmacy curriculum are required to validate whether this is a generalizable effect. Finally, the finding of significant differences in mean Grit-S scores for different cohorts at the same level in pharmacy school cautions against drawing conclusions of differences between, for example, students at different pharmacy schools based on a single cohort.

The mean initial Grit-S score of 3.6 (SD=0.5) across all of our respondents (n=547) was lower than Grit-S scores previously reported in pharmacy students, but similar to those of medical students.4,14,15 In contrast to a previous study by Pate and colleagues measuring grit in pharmacy students, we did not detect a significant association between students’ Grit-S score and GPA.15 Palisoc and colleagues also did not find a significant relationship between Grit-S score and academic success (defined as a GPA≥3.0 without course failures) in pharmacy students.14 Studies of grit in secondary and undergraduate education also report a lack of association between academic performance and grit.21,22 Because grit may explain up to 6% of the variance in academic outcomes, cohorts with limited GPA spread, such as those within our study, may not be significantly influenced by grit.1 We also hypothesize that differences in study subjects and methods may offer explanations for these results. Both the current study and study by Palisoc and colleagues obtained GPA data from student records rather than from students self-reporting, and subjects in both studies were primarily of Asian ethnicity. Datu and colleagues determined a lack of association between the Grit-S consistency of interest subscale and emotional wellbeing among Filipino students.23 The authors suggest that the “collectivist” culture of the Filipino people, which emphasizes group goals, may explain why this specific Grit-S subscale, which emphasizes individual interests and passion, was less predictive in their study.23 This theory supports our study’s finding that the Grit-S perseverance of effort subscale scored higher than the Grit-S consistency of interest subscale across all cohorts in this study.

Palisoc and colleagues found higher Grit-S scores among students who pursued and attained postgraduate training programs,14 whereas our study found a negative association between Grit-S score and likelihood of applying for an ASHP-accredited residency program, and no association with Grit-S score and the likelihood of achieving a residency match, either alone or after controlling for potential confounders. Comparing these findings is complicated by the fact that the prior study included two cohorts of students within the analysis and fewer than half of respondents applied for residency programs. Within our study population, 77% of respondents from the class of 2017 applied for a residency and served as the basis for our analysis. Other student characteristics that have previously been described as predictive of residency attainment and are relevant to our study cohort include: female gender, employment at an institutional pharmacy, age of the applicant, North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) pass rate, academic health center affiliation, and U.S. News & World Report rankings.24-27 While these characteristics were unavailable to compare between studies, grit may conceivably influence a student’s odds of passing the NAPLEX or gaining admission to a high-ranking pharmacy program. However, similar to the influence of grit on GPA, the additive value of grit on residency attainment, beyond these aforementioned predictors, may be marginal at best.

Our study also differs by exploring associations between underrepresented minority status and students’ Grit-S score and pharmacy GPA. Previous research suggests that underrepresented minority undergraduate students have high Grit-S scores (4.1) and that a strong correlation exists between grit and GPA, even when controlling for preadmission GPA and standardized examination scores (R=0.38, p<.01).16 While we did not detect a significant interaction between underrepresented minority status, Grit-S score, and GPA, we did find that underrepresented minority students had significantly higher Grit-S scores than non-underrepresented minority students. The implications of these findings on other curricular and professional outcomes warrants further study.

There are limitations to this study, and important considerations should be given to its external validity. Although our overall survey response rate was high (more than 80% compared to approximately 50% for the studies conducted by Pate and Palisoc and colleagues), the potential for response bias existed, particularly among fourth-year students for which our response rate was only 67% across the two cohorts who completed the survey. While study participants were similar to nonresponders on the majority of characteristics, some nonresponders had lower GPAs than responders. If the Grit-S scores of these nonresponders were substantial outliers, there could have been an overall effect on the relationship between Grit-S scores and academic performance. Another limitation to the generalizability of our results is that, unlike some pharmacy schools, our program does not assign letter grades to experiential coursework (including APPEs). However, we saw no evidence of a relationship between students’ Grit-S scores and their performance on a separate measure of APPE performance. Finally, the demographic characteristics of our students may limit the external application of our findings. Specifically, we had a high representation of the following: first-generation college students (≥50% in each cohort), students of East Asian/Filipino/Pacific Islander ethnicity (>50% of all respondents), and female students (70%). Additionally, almost all of the students had earned a bachelor’s degree prior to matriculation, and their undergraduate science and pharmacy school GPAs were ≥3.3. Given the previously identified relationships between these characteristics and Grit-S score and/or academic success, these results may not translate to other pharmacy schools that have a different student demographic from ours.

The predictive value of grit has come into question.28-30 Angela Duckworth, the psychologist who first characterized grit, has noted the limitations of the self-reported Grit-S questionnaire and cautions against employing the Grit-S for “diagnostic” purposes or to use in making high-stakes decisions related to students.31 This does not mean that the attribute of grit lacks value for better understanding the pharmacy student’s journey. The Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) 2013 Education Outcomes provides learning objectives that encompass grit: “maintain motivation…and interest (eg, habits of mind) during learning and work-related activities” and “demonstrate persistence and flexibility in all situations…”32 Grit-S scores may correlate better with other measures of professional competence and practice than with academic (and in our study, primarily didactic) course performance. Grit has more recently been associated with student productivity and engagement, two highly desired traits in a competent student.33 Yet, when measuring behaviors related to job performance (eg, organizational citizenship, counter productiveness, and task completion), grit adds little value beyond personality traits.34

Alternatively, there may be a need for other metrics encompassing this psychological construct that have better predictive value in higher education. Indeed, two modified grit scales have been developed. One scale shows greater predictive value for standardized test scores in secondary education, while the other scale is associated with measures of both academic and career self-efficacy.35,36 Interest in grit and its role in higher education will likely continue; however, whether grit should be included within student assessment models remains to be determined. Stoffel and Cain suggest that a major limitation in assessing grit is that it may not become evident until an individual is greatly challenged.37 Considering the high achievement and aptitude of students pursuing pharmacy school, pharmacy students may not be sufficiently challenged by a pharmacy core curriculum for attitudes and behaviors associated with grit to become evident. Experiential rotations and postgraduate residencies require students and graduates to have significant “grittiness” and therefore may be more appropriate settings in which to measure associations between grit and professional outcomes of interest. Until the role of grit is elucidated through additional well-designed studies of health professions students, we advise pharmacy schools against implementing this construct for high-stakes admissions or curricular decisions.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacy students’ Grit-S scores varied significantly by survey year and cohort without any study intervention. The change in direction of Grit-S scores could have resulted from curricular or extracurricular influences. Grit-S scores were higher among underrepresented minorities and African American students, but lower among first-generation college students. We did not detect a significant association between Grit-S score and measures of academic or professional achievement. The strongest predictor of pharmacy GPA was undergraduate (for P1 students) or prior pharmacy school (for P2-P4 students) GPA, and this effect was not modified by the addition of Grit-S score. Additionally, higher initial Grit-S scores were significantly associated with lower odds of applying to an ASHP-accredited residency. The demographic characteristics of our study population may explain some of these findings.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Jaekyu Shin, PharmD, at the University of California, San Francisco, in the design of the project and implementation of the survey, and Paul White, PhD, at Monash University for his helpful review. We are also most thankful to the UCSF SOP Assessment Committee and Ravinder Singh for ensuring access to the required data elements.

  • Received January 10, 2018.
  • Accepted March 25, 2018.
  • © 2019 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Duckworth AL,
    2. Peterson C,
    3. Matthews MD,
    4. Kelly DR
    . Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92(6):1087-1101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Duckworth AL,
    2. Quinn PD
    . Development and validation of the short grit scale (grit-s). J Pers Assess. 2009;91(2):166-174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chang W
    . Grit and Academic Performance: Is Being Grittier Better? [doctoral thesis]. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami; 2014.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fillmore E,
    2. Helfenbein R
    . Medical student grit and performance in gross anatomy: what are the relationships? FASEB J. 2015;29(1).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Shechtman N,
    2. DeBarger A,
    3. Dornsife C,
    4. Rosier S,
    5. Yarnall L
    . Promoting Grit, Tenacity, and Perseverance: Critical Fractors for Success in the 21st Century. U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. http://pgbovine.net/OET-Draft-Grit-Report-2-17-13.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2017.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Halliday L,
    2. Walker A,
    3. Vig S,
    4. Hines J,
    5. Brecknell J
    . Grit and burnout in UK doctors: a cross-sectional study across specialties and stages of training. Postgrad Med J. 2017; 93(1101):389-394.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cooke GP,
    2. Doust JA,
    3. Steele MC
    . A survey of resilience, burnout, and tolerance of uncertainty in Australian general practice registrars. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Shih AF,
    2. Maroongroge S
    . The importance of grit in medical training. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(3):399.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ray R,
    2. Brown J
    . Reassessing student potential for medical school success: distance traveled, grit, and hardiness. Mil Med. 2015;180(4 Suppl):138-141.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kelly AM,
    2. Townsend KW,
    3. Davis S,
    4. Nouryan L,
    5. Bostrom MPG,
    6. Felix KJ
    . Comparative assessment of grit, conscientiousness, and self-control in applicants interviewing for residency positions and current orthopaedic surgery residents. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(3):557-563.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hammond DA
    . Grit: An important characteristic in learners. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017;9(1):1-3.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Salles A,
    2. Cohen GL,
    3. Mueller CM
    . The relationship between grit and resident well-being. Am J Surg. 2014;207(2):251-254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Salles A,
    2. Lin D,
    3. Liebert C,
    4. et al
    . Grit as a predictor of risk of attrition in surgical residency. Am J Surg. 2017; 213(2):288-291.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Palisoc AJL,
    2. Matsumoto RR,
    3. Ho J,
    4. Perry PJ,
    5. Tang TT,
    6. Ip EJ
    . Relationship between grit with academic performance and attainment of postgraduate training in pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81(4):67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Pate AN,
    2. Payakachat N,
    3. Harrell TK,
    4. Pate KA,
    5. Caldwell DJ,
    6. Franks AM
    . Measurement of grit and correlation to student pharmacist academic performance. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81(6):105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Strayhorn TL
    . What role does grit play in the academic success of black male collegians at predominantly white institutions? J Afr Am Stud. 2014;18(1):1-10.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Meagher DG,
    2. Pan T,
    3. Perez CD
    . Predicting performance in the first-year of pharmacy school. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(5):81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Chen X
    . First Generation Students in Postsecondary Education: A Look at their College Transcripts (NCES 2005–171). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2005.
  19. 19.↵
    1. O'Neal CR
    . Individual versus peer grit: influence on later individual literacy achievement of dual language learners. Sch Psychol Q. 2018;33(1):112-119.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bandura A
    . Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Asian J Soc Psychol. 1999;2:21-41.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ivcevic Z,
    2. Brackett M
    . Predicting school success: comparing conscientiousness, grit, and emotion regulation ability. J Res Pers. 2014;52:29-36.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bazelais P,
    2. Lemay D,
    3. Doleck T
    . How does grit impact college students’ academic achievement in science? European J of Science and Mathematics Education. 2016;4(1):33-43.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Datu J,
    2. Valdez J,
    3. King R
    . Perseverance counts but consistency does not! Validating the short grit scale in a collectivist setting. Curr Psychol. 2016;35:121-130.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Morton J,
    2. Koval P,
    3. Gal P
    . Pharmacy residency match rates and predictors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(10):Article 212.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lyons K,
    2. Taylor D,
    3. Minshew L,
    4. McLaughlin J
    . Student and school-level predictors of pharmacy residency attainment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(2):Article 6620.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Phillips J,
    2. McLaughlin M,
    3. Rose C,
    4. et al
    . Student characteristics associated with successful matching to a PGY1 residency program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016;80(5):Article 84.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Whittaker A,
    2. Smith K,
    3. Shan G
    . Pharmacy residency school-wide match rates and modifiable predictors in ACPE-accredited colleges and schools of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81(10):6109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Crede M,
    2. Tynan MC,
    3. Harms PD
    . Much ado about grit: a meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017;113(3):492-511.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Rimfeld K,
    2. Kovas Y,
    3. Dale PS,
    4. Plomin R
    . True grit and genetics: predicting academic achievement from personality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016;111(5):780-789.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Ivcevic Z,
    2. Brackett M
    . Predicting school success: Comparing conscientiousness, grit, and emotion regulation ability. J Res Pers. 2014;52(Supplement C):29-36.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Duckworth AL,
    2. Yeager DS
    . Measurement matters: assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educ Res. 2015;44(4):237-251.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Medina MS,
    2. Plaza CM,
    3. Stowe CD,
    4. et al
    . Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(8):162.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hodge B,
    2. Wright B,
    3. Bennett P
    . The role of grit in determining engagement and academic outcomes for university students. Res High Educ. 2017;57(1).
  34. 34.↵
    1. Ion A,
    2. Mindu A,
    3. Gorbanescu A
    . Grit in the workplace: hype or ripe? Pers Individ Dif. 2017;111:163-168.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Sturman ED,
    2. Zappala-Piemme K
    . Development of the grit scale for children and adults and its relation to student efficacy, test anxiety, and academic performance. Learn Individ Differ. 2017;59(Supplement C):1-10.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Datu J,
    2. Yuen M,
    3. Chen G
    . Development and validation of the Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS): evidence from Filipino undergraduate students. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;114:198-225.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Stoffel J,
    2. Cain J
    . Review of grit and resilience literature within health professions education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(2):Article 6150.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 83, Issue 6
1 Aug 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Longitudinal Associations Between Grit, Academic Outcomes, and Residency Match Rates Among Pharmacy Students
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Longitudinal Associations Between Grit, Academic Outcomes, and Residency Match Rates Among Pharmacy Students
Katherine Gruenberg, Tina Brock, Conan MacDougall
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Aug 2019, 83 (6) 6947; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6947

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Longitudinal Associations Between Grit, Academic Outcomes, and Residency Match Rates Among Pharmacy Students
Katherine Gruenberg, Tina Brock, Conan MacDougall
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Aug 2019, 83 (6) 6947; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6947
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • Grit: what is it and why does it matter in medicine?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Multi-institutional Analysis of Student and Program Variables as Predictors of Performance on the NAPLEX
  • Exploring Factors That Influence Student Engagement in Community-Engaged Learning Activities Within a Pharmacy Context
  • Self-Assessment of Therapeutic Decision-Making Skills in Pharmacy Students
Show more RESEARCH

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • grit
  • achievement
  • academic success
  • pharmacy education

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2022 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire