Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLETTER

Response to “De-Conflating Religiosity/Spirituality”

Miriam C. Purnell and Mark S. Johnson
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education September 2019, 83 (7) 7776; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7776
Miriam C. Purnell
aUniversity of Maryland Eastern Shore School of Pharmacy, Princess Anne, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark S. Johnson
bShenandoah University, Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Winchester, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: We would like to thank Drs. Roane and Harirforoosh for their response to our brief, which appeared in the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.1 In our article, we state that “Pharmacy schools should find ways to acknowledge and support religiosity and spirituality of students and for promoting holistic patient well-being.” In their response to our article, Drs. Roane and Harirforoosh state “That pharmacy schools should provide additional support for spirituality as a part of student wellness, and for training in spirituality assessment for patients is a sound, progressive step forward. Support for religiosity is not.” They also express concern that we consistently “conflate spirituality and religiosity” in our article.

First, we would like to reiterate that spirituality and religiosity are two separate constructs, particularly when applied to the scientific literature. Religiosity is the more directly measurable construct; whereas, spirituality is a broader construct that is more indirectly and individually defined. There is certainly overlap and commonality between them; thus, they are often referenced together for general ease. Many patients may, in fact, view their religion as a means of expressing their spirituality. In our study, we assessed the results for data related to spirituality and religiosity separately. Additionally, separate statistical analyses were done for data related to each. However, we chose to group the two terms in the manuscript for ease of reporting results that were similar for both spirituality and religiosity.

In order to address the point of view that religiosity should not be supported by schools, we believe that it is imperative to review the definitions used in our article. Spirituality is defined as “a personal search toward understanding questions about life, its meaning, and its relationships to sacredness or transcendence that may or may not lead to the development of religious practices or formation of religious communities.”2 Religiosity is defined as the “extent to which an individual believes, follows, and practices a religion, either organizational (church or temple attendance) or non-organizational (praying, reading books, or watching religious programs on television).”2 When spirituality and religiosity are viewed in these contexts, both have a place in the pharmacy school curriculum.

Roane and Harirforoosh purport that “spirituality, as opposed to religiosity is likely more relevant to the desired outcomes of pharmacy educational programs.” As we stated in our article, numerous studies support the benefits of spirituality and religiosity on health. In fact, since religiosity is the more easily measured construct, more studies have focused on the impact of religiosity on health.

Furthermore, there is a growing body of literature that spirituality and religiosity can be beneficial to health outcomes. According to Zimmer and colleagues, the association between religion and health may be the result of three broad, but inter-related mechanisms: religious activity provides social support by bringing people with common values and interests together, which results in a larger quantity of social networks and in better quality of social interactions; religious denominations may encourage lifestyles that promote health (eg, meditation and mindfulness practices) and may discourage those that have a negative effect on health (eg, tobacco/alcohol use, or risky sexual behavior); and religious activity impacts psychosocial factors (eg, reduction of stress and provision of coping mechanisms).3 There are some negative and indifferent studies on the impact of spirituality and religiosity on health outcomes, and these also should be considered when reviewing the evidence; although, the preponderance of evidence is positive.3

Roane and Harirforoosh support the idea of training students in spiritual assessments, but do not support the same for religiosity. However, the two are interrelated. Lucchetti and colleagues published a systematic review comparing 25 instruments used for obtaining spiritual histories in patients.4 Of the topics that were most frequently included in each instrument, measures of religion were common, including: religious rituals and practices and their influence on treatment (17/25), religious affiliation (16/25), religious attendance (3/25), negative aspects of religion (10/25), religious rituals/practices and their influence on treatment (11/25), religious coping (17/25), religious support (19/25), option to discuss religious issues (17/25), and option to refer to the religious leader or chaplain (9/25). In fact, the Joint Commission requires institutions to address patients’ rights to access religious and other spiritual services and assess and support their beliefs and preferences.5 Thus, we feel that it is important for pharmacy schools to make students aware that patients have both religious and spiritual beliefs as these may certainly impact patient care and outcomes as evidenced in the literature. We are not condoning one religion or practice over another, but we do feel the goal is to make students and health care professionals aware of the many beliefs and practices that they may encounter in practice since these beliefs can have a significant impact on patient care and health outcomes.

Likewise, students and all health care professionals should acknowledge and be supported in their own religious and spiritual beliefs. We state in our article, “Due to the modest percentage (50%) of students [in our study] who felt that their pharmacy school supported their spiritual/religious beliefs, pharmacy schools should find ways to support students’ religious and spiritual needs in the community and on campus, through student organizations, in recognizing religious observances, and in resources.”

One of the origins of the word religion is actually from the Latin ligare meaning “to bind together.”6 Pharmacy schools, with or without a religious affiliation, are already finding ways to bind students with similar beliefs together through student organizations. There are currently 146 Christian Pharmacist Fellowship International (CPFI) student chapters across the Academy, with some schools having chapters at main campuses and satellite locations (Nena Lindrose, BS, CPFI Administrative Director, email communication, July 3, 2019). Additionally, Muslim student associations and Jewish student organizations are available at some pharmacy schools.7-9

Also, schools are choosing to promote student well-being by offering activities rooted in religion. For example, the Rhode Island College of Pharmacy implements regular yoga and meditation sessions for faculty, staff and students. The decision was influenced by the results of a study that Lemay and colleagues conducted at their institution to assess the effect of yoga and meditation on stress, anxiety, and mindfulness on pharmacy students.10 In this study, certified Registered Yoga Teacher 200 (RYT200) practitioners and Shambhala Path Meditation Instructors from the faculty at Rhode Island College of Pharmacy led students in yoga and meditation practices. It should be noted that Shambhala Path Meditation is based on Buddhist religious principles. The researchers found a statistical decrease in anxiety and stress and a statistical increase in mindfulness. The authors concluded that “Higher education, including Colleges of Pharmacy, may consider the inclusion of holistic methods, such as yoga and meditation, to support student self-care.”

We are delighted that our article has precipitated discussions about the role of spirituality and religion is pharmacy education. As we discussed in our article, the literature on spirituality and religion in pharmacy education is sparse. Pharmacy schools will need to consider how and where these topics are best addressed in their schools.

  • Received July 19, 2019.
  • Accepted August 12, 2019.
  • © 2019 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Purnell M,
    2. Johnson M,
    3. Jones R,
    4. et al
    . Spirituality and religiosity of pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(1):Article 6795. https://www.ajpe.org/doi/full/10.5688/ajpe6795
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Koenig HG,
    2. McCullough M,
    3. Larson D
    . Handbook of Religion and Health. New York: Oxford UP; 2001.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Zimmer Z,
    2. Rojo F,
    3. Ofstedal MB,
    4. Chiu CT,
    5. Saito Y,
    6. Jagger C
    . Religiosity and health: a global comparative study. SSM Popul Health. 2018;7:100322.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lucchetti G,
    2. Bassi RM,
    3. Lucchetti ALG
    . Taking spiritual history in clinical practice: a systematic review of instruments. Explore. 2013:9(3):159-170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hodge DR
    . A template for spiritual assessment: a review of the JCAHO requirements and guidelines for implementation. Soc Work. 2006;51(4):318-326.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Definition of 'religion'. Word origin of 'religion'. In: Collins English Dictionary-Complete & Unabridged 2012 Digital Edition. [online] William Collins Sons & Co Ltd; 2012. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/religion. Accessed July 9, 2019.
  7. 7.↵
    Manchester University. Pharmacy, Natural & Health Sciences. Student Organizations. Muslim Healthcare Professionals. https://www.manchester.edu/academics/colleges/college-of-pharmacy-natural-health-sciences/academic-programs/pharmacy/student-life/student-organizations. Accessed July 5, 2019.
  8. 8.↵
    St. Louis College of Pharmacy. Cultural and Interest-Based Organizations. https://www.stlcop.edu/campuslife/studentorgs/cultural.html. Accessed July 5, 2019.
  9. 9.↵
    Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (LIUPharmacy). Student Clubs and Organizations. Jewish Pharmaceutical Society. http://www.liu.edu/Pharmacy/∼/link.aspx?_id=00DC20E689074354B98B3177AAA3D8D7&_z=z. Accessed July 5, 2019.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lemay V,
    2. Hoolahan J,
    3. Buchanan A
    . Impact of a yoga and meditation intervention on students’ stress and anxiety levels. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(5):Article 7001. https://www.ajpe.org/doi/pdf/10.5688/ajpe7001
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 83, Issue 7
1 Sep 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to “De-Conflating Religiosity/Spirituality”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Response to “De-Conflating Religiosity/Spirituality”
Miriam C. Purnell, Mark S. Johnson
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2019, 83 (7) 7776; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7776

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Response to “De-Conflating Religiosity/Spirituality”
Miriam C. Purnell, Mark S. Johnson
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2019, 83 (7) 7776; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7776
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Our Priorities Are Not Evolving, but Our Strategies Are
  • Response to Smith et al Letter RE: Evolving Priorities Commentary
  • Response to: But Scholarship Can Be Hard in Many Ways
Show more LETTER

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2022 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire