Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers: Moving from Injustice to Equity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers: Moving from Injustice to Equity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLETTER TO THE EDITOR

Learning Assessment vs Program Evaluation

Michael J. Peeters and Kimberly A. Schmude
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education September 2020, 84 (9) ajpe7938; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7938
Michael J. Peeters
University of Toledo, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly A. Schmude
University of Toledo, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We appreciated Janke and colleagues’ review of high- and low-impact programmatic evaluation activities.1 This review seemed very helpful except for the authors’ broad and problematic use of the term assessment. Early in their article they gave a well-meaning definition of assessment practice as “a process, procedural sequence or system that accomplishes a specific goal related to curricular or programmatic improvement, utilizes specific strategies, tool and techniques, and is implemented and repeated with intention and discipline.”1 This explicit definition was beneficial but also showed that their broad use of the term assessment was actually focused on program evaluation. Within this narrower focus, their message remains valuable. However, aside from their useful article,1 it appears that pharmacy academia should add a qualifier before using the term assessment in future articles (eg, learning assessment, programmatic assessment) to facilitate communication.

Learning assessments from students are different from programmatic or curricular evaluation. While education disciplines (including medical education) use assessment to mean assessments of students’ learning, it seems that many in American pharmacy education, as well as those in other areas of institutional assessment at American universities, use assessment to refer to program evaluation. This misuse of the term assessment for program evaluation seems unfortunate. There are textbooks2 and internet-based resources3 on program evaluation. it would seem to be advantageous for pharmacy education to use the same terms that other fields use. Notably and as further evidence of this, the Assessment Special Interest Group (SIG) for the Association of Faculties of Pharmacy of Canada (the Canadian equivalent of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy) define assessment as “evaluation of persons’ performance (eg, students’)” and program evaluation as “evaluation of programmes’ performance.”4,5 In 2015, their Assessment SIG split into one SIG focused on Programmatic Assessment (Program Evaluation SIG) and another SIG focused on Learning Assessment (Educational Assessment SIG).6

Communication is foundational to building science. However, communication among disciplines will be more challenging if their meaning for terms such as assessment are dissimilar. Along with miscommunication among interdisciplinary colleagues, this also leads to a disjointed academic literature. For instance, a search for program evaluation produces a rich return of many current and seminal articles from many fields. Meanwhile, a search for assessment will produce a more-limited return of program evaluation articles from some fields, along with many articles from other disciplines focused on learning assessment. Because of this misuse of the word, the addition of a qualifier to assessment could foster improved communication among varied audiences, including when speaking with someone outside of American pharmacy education or even internationally within the discipline, such as with Canadian colleagues.

In the future, it would be helpful for communication if “assessment” in the Journal was not used so indiscriminately. Furthermore, in health professions education where “assessing” can also have a clinical connotation, authors would do well to be more specific rather than using the generic assessment term that can be easily misconstrued. Miscommunication can cause us to inadvertently misidentify, miscomprehend, and/or under-appreciate one another’s perspectives. And no one intends to do that.

  • Received November 25, 2019.
  • Accepted March 12, 2020.
  • © 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Janke KK,
    2. Kelley KA,
    3. Martin BA,
    4. Ray ME,
    5. Sweet BV
    . Identifying high-impact and managing low-impact assessment practices. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(7):Article 7496.
  2. 2.↵
    Fitzpatrick JL, Sanders JR, Worthen BR. Program Evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines. (4th ed). Pearson Education; Upper Saddle River NJ: 2011.
  3. 3.↵
    BetterEvaluation. https://www.betterevaluation.org. Accessed November 22, 2019.
  4. 4.↵
    Association of Faculties of Pharmacy of Canada. Educational Assessment SIG Terms of Reference. https://afpc.info/content/afpc-special-interest-groups-0. Accessed November 22, 2019.
  5. 5.↵
    Association of Faculties of Pharmacy of Canada Program Evaluation SIG Terms of Reference. https://afpc.info/content/afpc-special-interest-groups-0. Accessed November 22, 2019.
  6. 6.↵
    Association of Faculties of Pharmacy of Canada Communication. 2015;27(2):5. https://www.afpc.info. Accessed November 22, 2019.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 84, Issue 9
1 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Learning Assessment vs Program Evaluation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
17 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Learning Assessment vs Program Evaluation
Michael J. Peeters, Kimberly A. Schmude
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2020, 84 (9) ajpe7938; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7938

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Learning Assessment vs Program Evaluation
Michael J. Peeters, Kimberly A. Schmude
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2020, 84 (9) ajpe7938; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7938
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Response to “Gender and Minority Considerations in Pharmacy School Student Wellbeing”
  • Gender and Minority Considerations in Pharmacy School Student Wellbeing
Show more LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2021 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire