Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers: Moving from Injustice to Equity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers: Moving from Injustice to Equity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLETTER TO THE EDITOR

Response to Peeters and Schmunde: Toward More Clarity in the Use of the Terms Assessment and Program Evaluation

Kristin K. Janke, Katherine A. Kelley, Beth A. Martin, Mary E. Ray and Burgunda V. Sweet
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education September 2020, 84 (9) ajpe8296; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8296
Kristin K. Janke
aUniversity of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine A. Kelley
bThe Ohio State University, College of Pharmacy, Columbus, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth A. Martin
cUniversity of Wisconsin, School of Pharmacy, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary E. Ray
dUniversity of Iowa, College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Burgunda V. Sweet
eUniversity of Michigan, College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We appreciate the comments from Peeters and Schmunde1 regarding: the difficulties in using the terms assessment and program evaluation, and the utility of using qualifiers prior to the term assessment (eg, student learning outcomes assessment, institutional effectiveness assessment2) as a means of clarification.

Pharmacy education has a history of using programmatic assessment in reference to program-level data collection, data interpretation, and quality improvement efforts. Learning assessment also pervades our discussions as educators. However, these terms are often both communicated in general discussion as simply “assessment.” The work of our Canadian colleagues in differentiating between and supporting both assessment and program evaluation is inspiring and a model that we in the United States should examine further.

Outside of pharmacy, this terminology is also problematic. Universities may have an “office of institutional research” or an “office of institutional assessment,” when the work is largely evaluative. Assessment conference sessions include various forms of assessment and evaluation with few qualifiers in titles and descriptions. National organizations produce reports that advocate for change, often simultaneously, in both learning assessment and program evaluation without making clear distinctions or acknowledging when shifting from one to another. As practitioners in this space, we are regularly confronted by a lack of specificity, conflated terms, or inappropriate uses. In addition, we are often moving relatively seamlessly between these purposes and functions as we go about our daily work in assessment. The Association of Assessment of Learning in Higher Education recognizes this duality in its mission statement and acknowledges assessment practices as fostering and improving both student learning and institutional quality.3

Although the use of this terminology is muddy and the problems with use are pervasive, pharmacy educators can chart a path forward. To aid clarity, we can provide definitions. We can examine definitions for points of disparity or divergence from established norms and acknowledge also when agreement is not present. When terms become clunky, inaccessible or potentially create confusion for our audience, we can provide context within our writing to help bolster those definitions and terms. We can also recognize the various facets of our work and the disciplines that contribute to them. In particular in pharmacy education, we can continue to educate ourselves on the evaluation sciences and their value in program evaluation.

Assessment practices encompass all of the assessments and tools we use to perform the process of evaluation. As assessment practitioners, our goal was to promote the use of effective, high-impact assessment practices and tools to improve student learning in our programs.4

  • Received July 22, 2020.
  • Accepted August 10, 2020.
  • © 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Peeters MJ,
    2. Schmude KA
    . Learning assessment vs program evaluation [Letter]. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(9):Article 7938.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Association for the Assessment of Learning in Higher Education. Foundational Statement #1: What is Assessment in Higher Education? January 2020. https://www.aalhe.org/foundational-statement-1. Accessed July 21, 2020.
  3. 3.↵
    Association for the Assessment of Learning in Higher Education. Mission Statement. https://www.aalhe.org/mission-statement-and-strategic-plan. Accessed July 21, 2020.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Janke KK,
    2. Kelley KA,
    3. Martin BA,
    4. Ray ME,
    5. Sweet BV
    . Identifying high-impact and managing low-impact assessment practices. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(7):Article 7496.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 84, Issue 9
1 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to Peeters and Schmunde: Toward More Clarity in the Use of the Terms Assessment and Program Evaluation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Response to Peeters and Schmunde: Toward More Clarity in the Use of the Terms Assessment and Program Evaluation
Kristin K. Janke, Katherine A. Kelley, Beth A. Martin, Mary E. Ray, Burgunda V. Sweet
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2020, 84 (9) ajpe8296; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8296

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Response to Peeters and Schmunde: Toward More Clarity in the Use of the Terms Assessment and Program Evaluation
Kristin K. Janke, Katherine A. Kelley, Beth A. Martin, Mary E. Ray, Burgunda V. Sweet
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Sep 2020, 84 (9) ajpe8296; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8296
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Response to “Gender and Minority Considerations in Pharmacy School Student Wellbeing”
  • Gender and Minority Considerations in Pharmacy School Student Wellbeing
  • Learning Assessment vs Program Evaluation
Show more LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2021 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire