Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
LetterLETTER TO THE EDITOR

Response to Letter to the Editor Commenting on “Impact of a Yoga and Meditation Intervention on Students”

Virginia Lemay, John Hoolahan and Ashley Buchanan
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education May 2021, 85 (5) 8537; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8537
Virginia Lemay
University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Kingston, Rhode Island
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Hoolahan
University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Kingston, Rhode Island
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashley Buchanan
University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Kingston, Rhode Island
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the increase in stressors and uncertainty, mindfulness and coping strategies are essential components to support well-being. Thus, we are grateful for the opportunity to continue the conversation regarding yoga, meditation, and mindfulness in reducing stress and anxiety in college-aged students by responding to Léonard and colleagues.1

First, we concur with Léonard and colleagues that additional study interventions would have been ideal. In our manuscript, it was not feasible to extensively describe the specific contents of the yoga sessions. As stated in the Methods section, the intervention consisted of a 60-minute vinyasa yoga class followed by a 30-minute guided meditation.1 Vinyasa yoga, commonly referred to as “flow” yoga, is distinct from other styles of yoga, such as yin, hatha, and restorative. Common in the United States, vinyasa yoga classes are composed of a unique sequence of postures, transitioning smoothly from pose to pose. Our classes, or protocols, included thoughtful sequencing of postures reflective of vinyasa yoga classes that are readily available to the public and taught by Registered Yoga Teachers (RYT 200), as was our yoga instructor who had over a decade of practice experience. Quality check procedures would have been ideal to implement in a larger study if such valid assessments existed for this intervention. However, with such a small sample, we would not be able to exclude data points if found to be invalid through such an assessment. We agree that more attention could have been paid to metrics for feasibility; however, we were successful in recruiting participants, implementing the intervention, and collecting outcome data. Therefore, the entire project and process is a demonstration of feasibility of this type of study at the University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy (URI COP); thus, we refer to this as a pilot study.2 Last, we agree that future research should include a control group that is comparable to the intervention group, ideally with assignment to the intervention and control groups randomized. Given that this pilot study was focused on feasibility and examining preliminary results from a small sample, we did not have the resources to recruit a larger sample and randomize participants to intervention and control groups.

Several points stated by Léonard and colleagues were valuable to clarify the study and statistical design; however, many points were not accurate. First, Léonard and colleagues repeatedly referred to “both yoga instructors,” and further stated, “Moreover, both instructors did not receive the same yoga training, which might have biased the procedures and affected the internal validity, as it is unclear whether the instructors disseminated the same yoga routine (eg, postures, time holding the postures, etc),” yet we clearly stated in the Methods section that our yoga intervention was delivered by one RYT 200 and our meditation intervention was delivered by a Shambhala Path Meditation instructor, two distinct individuals, thus negating this critique.1 Next, Léonard and colleagues raised concerns about the external validity of our study. In the original publication, we made limited claims about external validity (ie, generalizability) of our findings.3 In fact, we agree the results may not be generalizable beyond our institution (URI COP). In a future study, participants could be obtained from different types of higher education settings, thereby addressing the impact of the intervention in different populations. Alternatively, in a larger sample, we could employ methods to generalize within-trial estimates to specific target populations of interest. Furthermore, quality check procedures would not improve external validity, but could improve internal validity if a valid procedure were developed for this intervention. Third, Léonard and colleagues stated a lack of adjustment for confounding; however, our approach adjusts for confounding by using a pre-post analysis. Time-invariant confounding is subtracted out by the individual level differencing, and each person serves as their own control.4 In this short follow-up period, temporal trends are less of a concern. The sample size was limited such that we were not able to run models that further adjusted for measured covariates. Regarding social desirability bias, we evaluated changes from pre to post intervention, so the impact of social desirability bias could impact both measures and possibly cancel out in the difference measures employed in the analysis. Léonard and colleagues questioned our hypothesis that students may experience higher levels of stress during final examinations, yet if true, this would have only attenuated our results towards the null. With regard to statistical power, Léonard and colleagues provided a power calculator for a four-arm study and their choice of statistical test was not clear. In this study, if power calculations were performed, these should be based on exact statistical tests, given the small sample size. However, because the analysis was for the purpose of generating hypothesis and providing preliminary estimates for an adequately powered future study, we did not perform power calculations for our study. Nonetheless, we employed statistical tests and procedures that provide valid statistical inference for small samples. For statistical tests, we performed exact tests, which are statistically valid for this type of study data and sample size. Due to the small sample sizes, the study may have been underpowered, thus, we acknowledged this point in the Discussion section.1 Last, Léonard and colleagues stated we did not report effect sizes; however, we reported the effect sizes as differences in means (post-scores minus pre-scores). Of note, their statement, "Lastly, although the results were statistically significant, the effect sizes were not reported, keeping us from knowing whether the decrease in symptoms was clinically significant," does not reflect what was published in our manuscript.

Although we appreciate the professional dialogue on methodology, it is imperative to remain focused on the intent and beneficial outcomes of this research. Students exhibit high levels of stress and their progress towards wellness, including a reduction in stress and anxiety, is of paramount importance.5-10 Our pilot study, termed SAMYAMA, was born from a sincere desire to create an environment where our students, faculty, and staff could practice mindfulness together. Secondary to existing literature supporting the benefits of mindfulness and our own grassroots research efforts, the URI COP has implemented a consistent yoga and meditation presence, including weekly drop-in guided meditation sessions since 2017, as supported by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.1,11 In spite of the COVID-19 restrictions, yoga classes have continued by using outdoor space and ensuring proper physical distancing, and meditative practices have been guided virtually using online platforms. Creating a wellness culture to support students' well-being has strong potential for benefits in higher education and should not be discouraged nor restrained, but instead evaluated and adopted across university settings.

  • Received January 6, 2021.
  • Accepted January 17, 2021.
  • © 2021 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lemay V,
    2. Hoolahan J,
    3. Buchanan A
    . Impact of a yoga and meditation intervention on students' stress and anxiety levels. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(5):7001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lancaster GA,
    2. Dodd S,
    3. Williamson PR
    . Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307-312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lesko CR,
    2. Buchanan AL,
    3. Westreich D,
    4. Edwards JK,
    5. Hudgens MG,
    6. Cole SR
    . Generalizing study results: a potential outcomes perspective. Epidemiology. 2017;28(4):553-561.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fitzmaurice GM,
    2. Laird NM,
    3. Ware JH
    . Applied longitudinal analysis. Vol. 998. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Beall JW,
    2. DeHart RM,
    3. Riggs RM,
    4. Hensley J
    . Perceived stress, stressors, and coping mechanisms among doctor of pharmacy students. Pharmacy (Basel). 2015;3(4):344-354.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Frick LJ,
    2. Frick JL,
    3. Coffman RE,
    4. Dey S
    . Student stress in a three-year doctor of pharmacy program using a mastery learning educational model. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(4):64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Marshall LL,
    2. Allison A,
    3. Nykamp D,
    4. Lanke S
    . Perceived stress and quality of life among doctor of pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(6):137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hirsch JD,
    2. Do AH,
    3. Hollenbach KA,
    4. Manoguerra AS,
    5. Adler DS
    . Students' health-related quality of life across the preclinical pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(8):147.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Maynor LM,
    2. Carbonara G
    . Perceived stress, academic self concept, and coping strategies of pharmacy students. Int J Pharm Educ Pract. 2012;9(1):1-9.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Schlesselman LS,
    2. Cain J,
    3. DiVall M
    . Improving and restoring the well-being and resilience of pharmacy students during a pandemic. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(6): ajpe8144.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. AACP statement on commitment to clinician well-being and resilience. https://www.aacp.org/resource/wellness-and-resilience-pharmacy-education. Accessed March 3, 2021.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 85, Issue 5
1 May 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to Letter to the Editor Commenting on “Impact of a Yoga and Meditation Intervention on Students”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Response to Letter to the Editor Commenting on “Impact of a Yoga and Meditation Intervention on Students”
Virginia Lemay, John Hoolahan, Ashley Buchanan
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education May 2021, 85 (5) 8537; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8537

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Response to Letter to the Editor Commenting on “Impact of a Yoga and Meditation Intervention on Students”
Virginia Lemay, John Hoolahan, Ashley Buchanan
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education May 2021, 85 (5) 8537; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8537
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comments on the Impact of a Yoga and Meditation Intervention on Students
  • Response to “Gender and Minority Considerations in Pharmacy School Student Wellbeing”
Show more LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2023 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire