Abstract
Objective. Rapid changes in the current US health care system, especially in the fields of pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences, require practicing pharmacists to acquire new knowledge and skills. Despite the growth of opportunities for pharmacists within new spaces such as nanotechnology, informatics, and pharmacogenomics, those without a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) degree could be eliminated from consideration by employers who seek new graduates with more contemporary training and skills. The purpose of this study was to determine what associations exist between student success within a nontraditional Doctor of Pharmacy (NTDP) program and certain demographic factors.
Methods. This quantitative longitudinal study was designed to determine which factors predict academic success among NTDP students entering the College of Pharmacy at Howard University. Academic success was measured by cumulative graduating grade point average (GPA). Data from four cohorts of students were used to develop multivariate linear regression models with several predictors including age, region of residence, citizenship status, previous pharmacy work background, and ethnicity.
Results. The study sample included 81 students whose mean cumulative GPA was 3.44. A foreign-born African heritage was predictive of a GPA that was significantly higher in comparison to African Americans after adjusting for other factors.
Conclusion. Findings showed that international students had a higher cumulative GPA in comparison to African American students in the NTDP program.
- nontraditional Doctor of Pharmacy
- Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) degree
- academic success
- Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU)
INTRODUCTION
Although the number of colleges offering Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) programs for working professionals has been declining, evidence suggests that innovation and continuous program improvement are key to sustaining recruitment and maintaining successful program delivery in today’s highly competitive market.1 This is attributable to the fact that recent changes in health care delivery have been spurred by systemic shifts. Such changes have required practicing pharmacists to acquire new knowledge and patient assessment skills in several areas.1,2
While opportunities for pharmacists are still growing, practicing pharmacists without a PharmD could face an unfavorable employment market should change of employment become desirable and/or necessary. Many entry-level pharmacy positions now require applicants to have a PharmD rather than a Bachelor of Science in pharmacy or the equivalent, and the PharmD is presently the only track offered for new graduates who enter the field within the United States.3
Despite these dynamics, there exist only four US institutions currently offering nontraditional pathways for registered pharmacists to obtain a PharmD (down from 38 in 2002).4 These nontraditional Doctor of Pharmacy (NTDP) degree programs were formed when the PharmD became the standard entry-level degree for those graduating from 2003 onward. These institutions have maintained their nontraditional programs largely because a reasonable applicant pool remains, with limited additional expenditures required by host institutions since there are “no separate accreditation requirements for nontraditional PharmD programs.”3,4
Each NTDP program, though similar in purpose, is structured differently in its requirements and delivery of didactic and experiential coursework. Accordingly, predictors of success may vary in NTDP programs, and schools serving a large proportion of racial and ethnic minorities may exhibit different predictors of success than majority institutions. Howard University College of Pharmacy offers a two-year NTDP program for US-licensed pharmacists. The NTDP program has produced over 350 graduates in 19 cohorts since its inception in fall 2003. Howard University is also the only Historically Black College and University (HBCU) currently offering an NTDP degree. The diversity of the program continues to be of interest to many perspective students globally. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors that may predict the cumulative graduating grade point average (GPA) of students enrolled in an NTDP program at an HBCU.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review was conducted by using the records for students entering the NTDP program in successive cohorts from 2015 to 2019. The data was maintained as a part of quality control, and the study was determined to be exempt by the Howard University Institutional Review Board. Individuals with complete admissions data were included. Individuals were excluded if they were dismissed from the program. The outcome was the student’s cumulative graduating GPA in the pharmacy program, which was measured as a continuous variable on a scale of one to four. All didactic courses taken during the first three semesters of the program contribute to a student’s GPA. The last semester consists of three experiential rotations which are graded on a pass-fail basis. Predictor variables included gender, ethnicity, region of residence within the United States while completing the program, residency status, and previous type of pharmacy work experience. The region of residence in the United States while completing the program was categorized as either Midwest, Northeast, South, or West. The residency status was classified as being a US citizen or a non-US citizen. Pharmacy work experience was categorized as community, hospital, or other. Individuals not working at the time of program entry were placed into the unemployed category. The ethnicity category considered whether the student was born in the United States or internationally. Accordingly, ethnicity was categorized as African American (born in the United States), African (of African descent and international), Asian, or White.
Descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize the nontraditional degree program participants. The independent samples t test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to evaluate whether a significant difference existed in students’ mean GPAs when grouped by gender, residency status, ethnicity, type of previous pharmacy work experience, and age.
Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the independent effect of each of the predictor variables on students’ GPAs after adjusting for other factors. The R2 value was used to evaluate the fit of regression models. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp), and an alpha value of 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.
RESULTS
The study included 81 students matriculating through the NTDP program from 2015 to 2019, as seen in Table 1. The mean cumulative GPA was 3.44 (SD=0.45). The students were nearly equally split between female (52%) and male (46%) students. The majority of students (65%) resided in the Southern region of the United States while completing their studies. Nearly half of the students (48%) were African Americans. Just under 70% of the students were US citizens, and the most frequent type of pharmacy career that students were engaged in upon entering the program was community pharmacy (57%).
Descriptive Characteristics of Students Enrolled in a Nontraditional Doctor of Pharmacy Program at a Historically Black University from 2015 to 2019, N=81
As seen in Table 2, the mean cumulative GPA varied when it was evaluated across certain categories. The mean GPA of 3.31 in African American students was significantly lower than the mean GPA of 3.75 obtained by international Africans (p<.05). There was also a significant difference in GPA by citizenship status (p<.05), as the GPA of US citizens (3.37) was lower than the GPA of students who were not US citizens (3.62). No other significant differences were noted in mean GPA in the bivariate analysis.
Mean Grade Point Average of Students in a Nontraditional Degree Program at a Historically Black University From 2015 to 2019
The R2 value of the multivariate linear regression model was 0.24, as depicted in Table 3. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, international African heritage was predictive of a higher cumulative GPA in comparison to African Americans. More specifically, international African heritage was predictive of a GPA that was 0.39 points higher in comparison to African Americans after adjusting for gender, region of the United States the student lived in while completing the program, residency status, and previous type of pharmacy work experience (p=.014). After adjusting for other factors, being a US citizen was no longer predictive of a lower GPA. In the multivariate model, being a US citizen was predictive of a GPA that was 0.22 points lower in comparison to non-US citizens after adjusting for other factors (p=.10).
Factors Predictive of Grade Point Average During the Nontraditional Degree Program at a Historically Black University from 2015 to 2019a
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to determine which associations exist between student success within the NTDP program and demographic factors. Success in this study was measured by cumulative graduating GPA. One key correlation was discovered: Though the majority of students enrolled in the NTDP program identified as African American and being born in the United States, being an international student who identified as African correlated with a higher graduating GPA. Students’ place of residence, gender, and race appeared to serve as lesser predictors of success.
The results of this study may reflect the sociodemographic dissections and paradoxes indicated by previous studies related to educational attainment among Black students within health care fields, most notably gaps in academic achievement between African Americans and other students.5-7 In the medical field, Rao and Flores attributed achievement gaps to factors such as lack of family support and role models.8 According to Kent and colleagues, the number of Black immigrants to the United States has increased by more than 300 percent in the past three decades,9 with roughly 4% of Black immigrants being from the African continent and 9% being from the Caribbean.10,11 Chiswick and Miller highlighted the fact that many African immigrants to the United States are highly skilled and highly educated due to the educational systems within their countries of origin.12 However, because of their racial minority status, once in the United States, African immigrants have been more likely to experience career “mismatches” than have other nonminority immigrant populations. This has placed many Africans in positions where their education level exceeds job qualifications.13,14
This historical phenomenon may explain trends prevalent within African immigrant populations today, which favor high educational and career attainment (degree seeking). Literature has revealed that many African immigrants may also be better prepared for the rigorous math and science-based curricula of PharmD programs than US-born students due to a “Western trend” of selecting highly skilled international students for immigration.15,16 The combination of a perceived need to obtain higher education to circumvent skills mismatches and to possess strong baseline skills may explain why pharmacy represents a choice profession for many African immigrants, and why greater levels of academic success are achieved therein. Additionally, the field is often emphasized within their countries of origin, accompanied by more recent advocacy efforts to grow the profession within these countries.17 Nigeria, for example, has more pharmacy training programs than any other African nation, with at least 17 schools currently offering a Bachelor of Pharmacy (BPharm). Ethiopia has more than seven programs, with at least two offering a master’s degree in pharmacy.18 Efforts demonstrating a strong thrust toward the PharmD have been well documented in studies detailing the current state of the pharmacy profession within Ethiopia.19
At the other end of the spectrum, the academic performance of US-born Black student populations was found to be lagging. Though not well studied or articulated within the field of pharmacy education, this mirrors a larger national trend that shows that an achievement gap exists between African American students and other students, possibly attributable to a lack of self-efficacy and early scientific exposure.6,20 The fact that distance learning programs may help to close the achievement gap between African American students and other students may be promising for NTDP programs, which use a distance-learning platform.6,21,22 Reasons cited are that African American students benefit from increased structure and inherent scheduling flexibility. Hybrid programs are cited as being the most beneficial option for African American students to make academic gains,23 as regular virtual interaction with instructors appears to enhance academic confidence and self-efficacy among African American students.23,24
Limitations of this study include the fact that investigators were not able to assess student motivations for enrollment in the NTDP program. This information may have helped to inform some of the demographic patterns observed within this study. The current study provides much-needed additional information to the currently scarce body of literature that examines predictors of GPA among students in NTDP programs.24 There are potentially important variables that were not recorded in this analysis, such as the number of years of prior experience the student had in pharmacy. However, GPA is a short-term measure of success in these adult learners, so future studies should examine other outcomes that may be of even greater importance, such as career trajectory. Moreover, because the sample included students from a single program, which primarily serves underrepresented students at an HBCU, study results may lack external validity. Recommendations for future study may, therefore, include exploring other NTDP programs to obtain more comprehensive data so that researchers can comparatively decipher trends and patterns related to student predictors of success.
CONCLUSION
The pharmacy profession is important on a societal level, particularly for communities of color. As such, NTDP programs address the critical need for well-trained pharmacists by equipping a diverse cross section of practicing pharmacists with new skills for serving present and future populations. This study investigated an area that currently lacks awareness and attention within pharmacy, namely factors that predict academic achievement within nontraditional degree programs. Findings revealed that international students had a higher cumulative GPA in comparison to African American students in the NTDP program. Methods for leveling student performance across demographic groups would be a worthwhile focus for future research.
- Received February 18, 2021.
- Accepted October 18, 2021.
- © 2022 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy