Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Other Publications

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
  • Other Publications
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Advanced Search

  • Articles
    • Current
    • Early Release
    • Archive
    • Rufus A. Lyman Award
    • Theme Issues
    • Special Collections
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Process
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Call for Papers - Intersectionality of Pharmacists’ Professional and Personal Identity
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Instructions
    • Call for Mentees
    • Reviewer Recognition
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • About
    • About AJPE
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • History
  • More
    • Meet the Editors
    • Webinars
    • Contact AJPE
  • Follow AJPE on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Brief ReportBRIEF

Assessment of Areas of Worklife Among Pharmacy Educators

Shareen Y. El-Ibiary, Mina Salib and Kelly C. Lee
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education October 2022, 86 (7) 8671; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8671
Shareen Y. El-Ibiary
aMidwestern University, College of Pharmacy, Glendale, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mina Salib
bCVS Pharmacy, Peoria, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly C. Lee
cUniversity of California, San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, San Diego, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To assess in pharmacy academicians the six domains of worklife (community, control, fairness, reward, workload, values) that have been associated with burnout and poor job satisfaction.

Methods. We aimed to assess the Areas of Worklife Survey (AWS) among a sample of pharmacy academicians attending a national meeting to evaluate personal, environmental, or workplace factors that may influence the worklife environment. Data were analyzed using SPSS, descriptive statistics were identified, and Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson correlations were performed.

Results. The participant response rate was 40% (n=49/121 attendees). Eighty-eight percent of participants reported working more than 40 hours per week. Mean AWS scores ranged from 2.7 to 3.9 (whereby 1 indicated a strong mismatch between person and work environment and 5 indicated a strong match). The workload and fairness domains had the lowest reported scores, whereas control had the highest. Higher mean scores were reported for control and reward in those with a mentor and for fairness in those having a hobby.

Conclusion. Participants gave the lowest ratings to two worklife areas, workload and fairness. Developing targeted interventions, such as in mentorship, hobbies, and transparency in the work setting, may be important for preventing burnout in pharmacy academicians. Further studies in a larger population may help to determine factors associated with the areas of worklife that received low ratings.

Keywords
  • areas of worklife
  • pharmacy
  • faculty
  • burnout

INTRODUCTION

According to literature and the National Academy of Medicine, health care professionals are facing high levels of burnout. 1-5 Burnout is defined as emotional exhaustion, maladaptive detachment, and low personal accomplishment in response to prolonged work stress. 1, 6 In 2015 and 2016, nationwide surveys found that over 40% of pharmacy practice faculty and 57% of clinical pharmacists reported high levels of emotional exhaustion. 4, 5 Burnout in other health care professions has been reported at rates of 35%-54% in nurses and in 50% of physicians. 2 Burnout can result in reduced productivity, absenteeism, job turnover, and low organizational commitment, affecting morale, increasing the risk of depression and suicide, causing career regret, and hindering professional development. 1, 7, 8 The National Academy of Medicine reports the estimated societal cost attributed to burnout is 4.6 billion dollars each year in the United States. 1

As found by Leiter and Maslach, one of the main contributors to occupational stress and burnout is job-person fit, namely the extent to which one’s expectations of his or her job match the work environment. 9, 10 Maslach and colleagues identified six areas of worklife that affect job-person fit and developed the Areas of Worklife Survey (AWS). 9-11 The AWS domains include values (personal and organizational values match), control (having input into decisions that affect one’s work), reward (recognition and receiving attention for one’s work), fairness (free from bias or injustice), workload (amount of work to be done), and community (relationships in the workplace). 11 The AWS has been administered to nurse practitioners, surgeons, primary care physicians, and others in the medical field. 12-15 To our knowledge, no studies using the AWS in pharmacy or pharmacy education have been published.

The objective of this study was to assess worklife environment using the AWS in a sample of pharmacy academicians attending a national meeting. Personal, environmental, or workplace factors that may influence areas of worklife could be potential targets for improving job-person fit and potentially preventing burnout.

METHODS

In spring 2019, we administered an anonymous, voluntary survey to academicians attending the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Spring 2019 Institute on Faculty and Student Well-Being. The six worklife areas were assessed using the 28-question AWS purchased from Mindgarden.com (Mind Garden Inc). Respondents were asked to rate their agreement with each statement using a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=hard to decide, 4=agree, and 5=strongly agree). The AWS is scored by calculating six scores, one for each area of worklife (exact calculation schema is not provided due to its proprietary nature). In the original validation study, Leiter and Maslach showed that lower scores indicate a higher degree of mismatch or incongruence between the respondent and the workplace. 16 They also showed that the AWS was consistently highly correlated with the three burnout dimensions (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment) as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory. We also included demographic questions as well as work-related items that have been previously associated with burnout. 5, 17 Completion of the paper surveys served as consent, and data were entered into Qualtrics (Qualtrics International Inc). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographic and faculty characteristics. Mean AWS scores were calculated to compare this sample to normative samples from validation studies. 18 Pearson correlations were used to measure relationships between worklife areas and demographic variables. All data were analyzed using SPSS, version 26.0 (IBM Corp). The study was approved by the Midwestern University Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

Of the 121 attendees, 49 completed the survey (40.4%). Demographic results are listed in Table 1. These demographics are consistent with the current demographics of the Academy, except that our sample had a higher number of women and Black or African American respondents. 19 The mean AWS scores ranged from 2.7 to 3.9, where one represents a strong mismatch between the person and their work environment, and five represents a strong match between the person and work environment. The worklife areas with the lowest mean scores were workload and fairness, whereas the area with the highest mean score was control (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Key Demographics of Pharmacy Academicians Who Responded to the Areas of Worklife Survey While Attending a National Meeting (N=49)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Mean Scores for Areas of Pharmacy Academicians’ Worklife Stratified by Mentor and Hobby

The mean scores for each worklife area did not differ between men and women, those with children and without, type of institution, academic rank, salary, clinical practice, or administrative role. A significant difference in mean scores for control was found based upon tenure status (reported mean [SD]; nontenured, nontenure-track = 4.04 [.60]; nontenured, tenure-track = 3.54 [.55]; tenured = 3.59 [.58]; p=.04). Further, we found significant differences in the mean rank scores for some worklife domains depending on whether respondents had a mentor or hobby (Table 2). Those who had a mentor had higher mean scores for control and reward compared to those without a mentor; those who had a hobby had higher mean scores on the fairness domain than those without a hobby. The mean scores for community were highest among those who reported exercising four to five hours per week (3.88 [.74]) compared to those who reported exercising zero to one hour per week (2.94 [0.82]; p=.03). A similar trend was seen for the fairness domain, in which the mean rank score was highest for those reporting exercising four to five hours per week (3.12 [.61]) compared to those who reported exercising zero to one hour per week (2.39 [0.67]; p=.04). The domains of control and fairness were both positively correlated with the number of hours per week spent at a clinical practice but were negatively correlated with the number of hours per year devoted to didactic teaching (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Correlation Analysis for Areas of Worklife and Clinical Practice and Teaching Hours

DISCUSSION

Leiter and colleagues identified six areas of worklife that contribute to job-person fit, which is an integral part of work engagement. 6-8 The stronger the match between these worklife domains and an individual’s work expectations, the better the fit, which may help people engage more with work and decrease the risk of burnout. 7

The lowest-rated areas of worklife in this study were workload and fairness. The majority of pharmacy faculty who took part in this study worked over 40 hours per week, and more than one-third worked over 50 hours per week, indicating that academicians have high workweek hours. High workweek hours (>40 hours/week) have been found among those with emotional exhaustion and burnout. 5, 17, 20 Students’ excessive demands have been positively related to emotional exhaustion and negatively related to work engagement. 21 Furthermore, changes in the current pool of pharmacy applicants may also affect needs or demands of students that faculty may face. 22 Overall, workload may be a modifiable factor that administrators should regularly review and adjust. Options may include increasing the number of faculty, distributing the workload, increasing support staff to minimize administrative burden, having clearly defined work duties, or adjusting promotion expectations. A study by Conklin and colleagues revealed excessive workload to be one of the top reasons for leaving an institution. 23

Fairness was also rated lower than other areas of worklife. Maslach and colleagues highlighted that injustice in the workplace can discourage engagement and increase emotional exhaustion, 9 and it may cause employees to distance themselves from work emotionally and physically. 9, 10 In addition, unfairness may decrease employees’ trust in, collegiality/community within, and loyalty to the institution, causing turnover or resulting in employees leaving academia completely. 9, 23 Our data suggest that worklife environment issues may exist within pharmacy academia that may need to be modified. Some solutions may include increasing transparency in the promotion process, equilibrating workload distribution and compensation, fostering civility, and creating a culture of inclusion and belonging. 9 Incivility (whether short- or long-term) in the workplace can have devastating consequences for an organization. Incivility in the workplace can result in decreased work effort, decreased time spent at work, lost work time due to worrying about an incident or avoiding the offender, and decreased commitment to an organization. 24 In addition to faculty taking responsibility for their behaviors and interacting professionally with others, leaders can use strategies to improve workplace civility, such as modeling good behavior, asking for feedback, rewarding positive behavior, penalizing poor behavior, and conducting exit interviews. 24, 25

Control was the highest-rated item among participants. Those with a clinical site felt that they had more control in their workplaces. Perhaps those with a clinical practice feel they have more opportunities to participate in workplace decisions or are able to exercise more autonomy at their practice sites versus those without a clinical practice. In another study, the majority of a sample of faculty physicians reported that the most meaningful part of their job was patient care and that when they spent less than 20% of their time doing the most meaningful work, they had higher rates of burnout (53.8% vs 29.9%, p<.001). 26 Identifying what faculty value most in their job may be a strategy to help prevent and reduce faculty burnout. 26 Shared governance can also give faculty a sense of control in the workplace and improve faculty satisfaction and potentially retention; however, according to an AACP report, great variability exists in how shared governance is practiced within schools of pharmacy. 27-29 Institutions should put forth increased effort to ensure that all full-time faculty members have the opportunity to participate in governance. In the previously referenced study by Conklin and colleagues, a top reason that pharmacy faculty gave for remaining at their institution was autonomy, potentially indicating that control is an important domain for pharmacy academicians even through factors such as workload may result in leaving academia. 23

In our study, nontenure-track academicians reported having a greater sense of control in worklife than did those who were striving for tenure or who had achieved tenure. Perhaps for nontenure-track academicians, the perception or ability to freely change positions may contribute to one’s sense of control in worklife, whereas those who are devoting or have devoted considerable time to achieve tenure may feel they have fewer options. This seems counterintuitive, as tenure status is generally regarded as desirable because it offers security of a position; however, those with tenure may feel they do not want leave an institution and lose their hard-earned tenure to begin elsewhere possibly without tenure. In addition, for those seeking tenure, they may not want to jeopardize their chances of tenure and feel they have decreased control to decline duties or opportunities.

Our data show that having a mentor may help improve the perception of control and reward. Both areas were rated significantly higher in participants who had a mentor compared to those without. Mentoring has been cited in other research as a way to possibly prevent burnout, increase job satisfaction, decrease turnover, and increase success at work, in particular for junior faculty. 5, 30, 31 Mentors and role models have been shown to create a supportive community in addition to promoting professional growth. 30-32

Our data show that having a hobby may influence perceptions of fairness. Leisure activities are defined as pleasurable activities that individuals voluntarily engage in, free from the constraints of work or other responsibilities. Leisure activities can include hobbies such as sports, socializing, spending time alone or in nature, and relaxation activities that lead to positive thoughts. Such activities often require minimal mental effort, give a sense of “being away,” and provide distraction or relief from recurrent negative thoughts. 33 It is plausible that those with a hobby ruminate less on work issues because they are otherwise engaged. Pressman and colleagues found that enjoyable leisure activities may be associated with psychological and physical well-being. 33 Hobbies have also been shown to improve physical health, reduce stress, and improve work performance. 33 Thus, one strategy to incorporate and help to sustain work-life balance may be to encourage faculty to develop or maintain hobbies.

Our study was limited by a small sample size, and differences between groups may not have been detected due to the small sample. Data were limited to those who attended the AACP Spring 2019 Institute on Faculty and Student Well-Being and consented to participate in the study. Attendance at the meeting may have skewed data based on attendees’ interest in this particular subject.

CONCLUSION

Evaluating areas of worklife may help to identify job-person mismatches that may contribute to burnout among pharmacy academicians. Important steps to prevent burnout among pharmacy academicians might be targeted interventions such as mentoring programs, workload evaluations, transparency in the workplace, and encouraging hobbies outside of work. Future studies with a larger sample may help to identify additional predictive factors associated with areas of worklife in academic pharmacy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Midwestern University for providing an intramural research grant that covered project costs.

  • Received March 31, 2021.
  • Accepted November 15, 2021.
  • © 2022 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    National Academy of Medicine. Action Collaborative on Clinician Well-Being. Available at: https://nam.edu/initiatives/clinician-resilience-and-well-being/. Accessed September 1, 2022.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dyrbye LN,
    2. Shanafelt TD,
    3. Sinsky CA,
    4. et al.
    Burnout among health care professionals: A call to explore and address this underrecognized threat to safe, high-quality care. NAM Perspectives. 2017 Discussion Paper, National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Essary AC,
    2. Bernard KS,
    3. Coplan B,
    4. et al.
    Burnout and job and career satisfaction in the physician assistant profession. A review of the literature. NAM Perspectives. 2018 Discussion Paper. National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jones GM,
    2. Roe NA,
    3. Louden L,
    4. Tubbs CR
    . Factors Associated With Burnout Among US Hospital Clinical Pharmacy Practitioners: Results of a Nationwide Pilot Survey. Hosp Pharm. 2017;52(11):742-751.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. El-Ibiary SY,
    2. Yam L,
    3. Lee KC
    . Assessment of Burnout and Associated Risk Factors Among Pharmacy Practice Faculty in the United States. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81(4):75.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Maslach C,
    2. Jackson SE,
    3. Leiter MP
    . Maslach Burnout Inventory manual3rd edition Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Barton LL,
    2. Friedman AD,
    3. Locke CJ
    . Stress in pediatric faculty. Results of a national survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995; 149(7):751-757.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lee P,
    2. Miller MT,
    3. Kippenbrock TA,
    4. Rosen C,
    5. Emory J
    . College nursing faculty job satisfaction and retention: A national perspective. J Prof Nurs. 2017;33(4):261-266.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Maslach C,
    2. Leiter MP
    . New insights into burnout and health care: Strategies for improving civility and alleviating burnout. Med Teach. 2017;39(2):160-163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Maslach C,
    2. Leiter MP
    . Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(3):498-512.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Leiter MP,
    2. Maslach C
    . Areas of Worklife Survey. 2000, 2011. Mindgarden, Inc. www.mindgarden.com; Menlo Park, CA.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gregory ST,
    2. Menser T
    . Burnout Among Primary Care Physicians: A Test of the Areas of Worklife Model. J Healthc Manag. 2015;60(2):133-148.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ellis RJ,
    2. Nicolas JD,
    3. Cheung E,
    4. et al.
    Comprehensive Characterization of the General Surgery Residency Learning Environment and the Association With Resident Burnout. Ann Surg. 2021;274(1):6-11.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bourdeanu L,
    2. Pearl Zhou Q,
    3. DeSamper M,
    4. Pericak KA,
    5. Pericak A
    . Burnout, Workplace Factors, and Intent to Leave Among Hematology/Oncology Nurse Practitioners. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2020; 11(2):141-148.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Verret CI,
    2. Nguyen J,
    3. Verret C,
    4. Albert TJ,
    5. Fufa DT
    . How Do Areas of Work Life Drive Burnout in Orthopaedic Attending Surgeons, Fellows, and Residents? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(2):251-262.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. P. Perrewé &
    2. D. C. Ganster
    1. Leiter MP,
    2. Maslach C
    . Areas of worklife: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. In P. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster, (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being: Vol. 3. Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies: Oxford, UK: JAI Press/Elsevier; 2004.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lee KC,
    2. Fairman KA,
    3. El-Ibiary SY
    . Item analysis of emotional exhaustion in pharmacy practice faculty. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020;12(5):504-507.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Brom SS,
    2. Buruck G,
    3. Horvath I,
    4. Richter P,
    5. Leiter M
    . Areas of worklife as predictors of occupational health – A validation study in two German samples. Burnout Research. 2015;2(2-3):60-70.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. 2020-21 Profile of Pharmacy Faculty. February 2021. Available at: https://www.aacp.org/system/files?file=2021-02/PPF-2021-final.pdf&Token=C49BC739-4C12-4DA3-B8BD-6843125964C7. Accessed on September 1, 2022.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Le HM,
    2. Young SD
    . Evaluation of stress experienced by pharmacy residents. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017;74(8): 599-604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Martini M,
    2. Guidetti G,
    3. Viotti S,
    4. Loera B,
    5. Converso D
    . Sometimes It Drains, Sometimes It Sustains: The Dual Role of the Relationship with Students for University Professors. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:9875090.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Pavuluri N,
    2. Aparasu RR,
    3. Boje KMK,
    4. et al.
    Consideration of Aggressive and Strategic Approaches to Address Declining Enrollment in US Pharmacy Schools. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(6):6959.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Conklin MH,
    2. Desselle SP
    . Job turnover intentions among pharmacy faculty. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(4):62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Porath C,
    2. Pearson C
    . The price of incivility. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;91(1-2):114-121, 146.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Desselle SP,
    2. Raja L,
    3. Andrews B,
    4. Lui J
    . Perceptions of organizational culture and organizational citizenship by faculty in U.S. colleges and schools of pharmacy. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(4):403-412.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Shanafelt TD,
    2. West CP,
    3. Sloan JA,
    4. et al.
    Career fit and burnout among academic faculty. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):990-995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kennedy DR,
    2. Harrell TK,
    3. Lodise NM,
    4. et al.
    Current Status and Best Practices of Shared Governance in US Pharmacy Programs. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(7):Article7281.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Coyle YM,
    2. Aday LA,
    3. Battles JB,
    4. Hynan LS
    . Measuring and predicting academic generalists’ work satisfaction: implications for retaining faculty. Acad Med. 1999;74(9):1021-1027.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lowenstein SR,
    2. Fernandez G,
    3. Crane LA
    . Medical school faculty discontent: prevalence and predictors of intent to leave academic careers. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Fuller K,
    2. Maniscalco-Feichtl M,
    3. Droege M
    . The role of the mentor in retaining junior pharmacy faculty members. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Triemstra JD,
    2. Iyer MS,
    3. Hurtubise L,
    4. et al.
    Influences on and Characteristics of the Professional Identity Formation of Clinician Educators: A Qualitative Analysis. Acad Med. 2021;96(4):585-591.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Feldman MD,
    2. Arean PA,
    3. Marshall SJ,
    4. Lovett M,
    5. O’Sullivan P
    . Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university. Med Educ Online. 2010;15. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/meo.v15i0.5063 Accessed September 1, 2022.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Pressman SD,
    2. Matthews KA,
    3. Cohen S,
    4. et al.
    Association of enjoyable leisure activities with psychological and physical well-being. Psychosom Med. 2009;71(7):725-732.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Vol. 86, Issue 7
1 Oct 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Areas of Worklife Among Pharmacy Educators
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessment of Areas of Worklife Among Pharmacy Educators
Shareen Y. El-Ibiary, Mina Salib, Kelly C. Lee
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Oct 2022, 86 (7) 8671; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8671

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of Areas of Worklife Among Pharmacy Educators
Shareen Y. El-Ibiary, Mina Salib, Kelly C. Lee
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Oct 2022, 86 (7) 8671; DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8671
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar AJPE Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing the Impact of a Personal Finance Elective Course on Student Attitudes and Intentions
  • Frequency of Course Remediation and the Effect on North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination Pass Rates
  • How Resilience and Wellness Behaviors Affected Burnout and Academic Performance of First-Year Pharmacy Students During COVID-19
Show more BRIEF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • areas of worklife
  • pharmacy
  • faculty
  • burnout

Home

  • AACP
  • AJPE

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Release
  • Archive

Instructions

  • Author Instructions
  • Submission Process
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewer Instructions

About

  • AJPE
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Board
  • History
  • Contact

© 2023 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Powered by HighWire