Moving AACP Curriculum Quality Survey Results from Good to Great

Abstract

Although the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Curriculum Quality Surveys (CQS) are required for programs to distribute and utilize as part of accreditation standards, programs face challenges in survey administration and timing, interpreting data and results, and following up on action plans. Because the CQS surveys are standardized, they can allow for greater comparison among institutions, yet interpretation of the items can vary considerably. Programs have flexibility in determining samples for administration and timing of administration (i.e., number of years), but some participants (such as preceptors) can suffer from survey overload if multiple institutions administer in the same year. Determining thresholds for action and providing feedback to stakeholders on improvements made based on data triangulations can be daunting. These are a few of the elements programs must consider when determining their own approach to the AACP CQS. Thus, the purpose of this commentary is to describe good practices for using the AACP CQS, challenges associated with the surveys, and recommend how to move the utilization of the surveys from good to great.