CLINICAL REASONING SKILLS | Scope of Hypotheses | The presentation traces a logical process of hypotheses generation and application of case evidence and literature to refine the hypotheses. Clear and methodical reasoning skills are demonstrated. | The presentation shows clear evidence that a range of issues has been examined in the process of hypotheses generation; pre-existing knowledge and reasoning skills have been methodically applied to refine the hypotheses. | The presentation contains clear evidence of hypotheses generation and application of pre-existing knowledge and reasoning skills to refine their hypotheses. | The presentation contains some evidence of an attempt to explore range of issues in generating and logically refining hypotheses. | Evidence of hypotheses generation and refinement is limited. |
Problem Solving Skills | Patient health related issues evident in the case are prioritised, and resolved accurately. | Patient health related issues evident in the case are identified, prioritised and some ability to resolve them accurately is demonstrated. | Patient health related issues evident in the case are identified, and some ability to resolve them accurately is demonstrated. | The obvious patient health related issues evident in the case are identified. | Patient health related issues evident in the case are incorrectly or incompletely identified. |
Research Evidence | Recommendations for case management are accurately referenced and supported by current evidence from the scientific literature. | The evidence base for patient management recommendations is incorrect or inadequately referenced. |
APPLICATION | Application of Case | Practical applications of the learning from the case, and instances where the learning can be transferred into professional practice are provided. | Practical applications of the learning from the case are provided. | A practical application of the learning from the case is provided. | Practical application of the learning is missing from the presentation. |
TEAMWORK | Cohesiveness | The presentation shows a high level of cohesiveness. Facts, ideas and arguments contribute consistently to the overall recommendations. The work clearly represents the collated thoughts and ideas of the small group. | The presentation shows a high level of cohesiveness. Facts, ideas and arguments contribute consistently to the overall recommendations. | The presentation appears internally consistent, without contradictions or duplications in the presented material. | The presentation shows evidence of disparate individual contributions without leading to contradiction or duplication. | The group presentation contains contradictions and / or duplications. |
PRESENTATION SKILLS | Summary | The case summary is a concise and comprehensive picture of the patient's salient issues. | The case summary provides the salient issues related to the patient. | The presentation includes a case summary. | The presentation fails to include a case summary. |
Case Organization | The presenters greatly enhance the audience's understanding of the case with clear organisation and structure. | The presenters facilitate the audience's understanding of the case with clear organisation and structure. | Organisation of the case aids and the audience's understanding. | Some organisation is evident. | The organisation of the presentation is not apparent. |
Aesthetics | The presentation is enhanced with appropriate graphical and audio-visual features which add to the understanding of the case | |
Creativity | Use of innovative and fresh ideas makes the PBL case scenario presentation compelling and communicative. | | | |